APHC010285672026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE 16th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TUHIN KUMAR GEDELA WRIT PETITION NO: 14908 OF 2026 Between: 1. M/s. Sri Satya Electrical works, Rep. by its Managing Partner, Vurum Madhavi, W/o Late. Vurum Lingaiah Devera, R/o D.No. 17-6-22, Veerraju Master Street, Ramachandrapurann, Dr. B.R. Ambedkar Konaseema District. (Erstwhile East Godavari District) 2. Vurum Madhavi, W/o Late. Vurum Lingaiah Devera, Aged about 46 years, R/o D.No. 17-6-22, Veerraju Master Street, Ramachandrapuram, Dr. B.R. Ambedkar Konaseema District. (Erstwhile East Godavari District) ...Petitioners AND 1. Union Barik of India Erstwhile Andhra Bank, Ramachandrapuram Branch, D.No.22-3-22/6, Surya Cinemax Complex, Opposite Old Bus Stand, Ramachahdrapuram - 533 255, Ramachandrapuram, Dr. B.R. Ambedkar Konaseema District. (Erstwhile East Godavari District) ...Respondent Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondent Bank in initiating proceedings under securitization and reconstruction of 2 financial assets and enforcement of security interest (SARFAESI Act, 2002) and in contemplating to take physical possession and of the immovable property/secured asset i.e., Residential RCC Building and Ground floor, and 2nd floors is situated in an extent of 295.55 square yards D.No. 17-6- 22, R.S.No.478/1 and 480/1, Ward No.10, Block No.17, Veeraju Master Street, Ramachandrapuram, Dr. B.R. Ambedkar Konaseema District (Erstwhile East Godavari District) through an Advocate Commissioner appointed by the Honble Chief Judicial Magistrate-cum-Principal Civil Judge (Senior Division), Rajamahendra varam in Crl.M.P.No.261 of 2026 in respect of loan amount Nos. 0467311500000265 and 40673010011628 3, as illegal, irregular, irrational and violation of the provisions of the Securitization and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 besides violation of principles of natural justice, and consequently to direct the respondent bank to consider the petitioner's request for payment of the balance due amount by granting considerable time and pass such IA NO: 1 OF 2026 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to grant interim stay of all further proceedings in pursuance of the orders in Crl.M.P.No.261 of 2026, on the file of the Chief Judicial Magistrate-cum- Principal Civil Judge (Senior Division), Rajamahendravaram and notice issued by the Advocate Commissioner to take physical possession of the immovable property/secured asset i.e.. Residential RCC Building and Ground floor, 1st and 2nd floors is situated in an extent of 295.55 square yards D.No.17-6-22, R.S.No.478/1 and 480/1, Ward No.10, Block No.17, Veeraju Master Street, Ramachandrapuram, Dr. B.R. Ambedkar Konaseemd District (Erstwhile East Godavari District) through an Advocate Commissioner appointed by the Honble Chief Judicial Magistrate-cum- Principal Civil Judge (Senior Division), Rajamahendravaram in Crl.M.P.No.261 of 2026 in respect of loan amount Nos. 0467311500000265 and 406730100116283 of the 3 respondent Bank during the pendency of this writ petition, in the interest of justice and pass such Counsel for the Petitioners: K J V N PUNDAREEKAKSHUDU Counsel for the Respondent V DYUMANI The Court made the following order: 4 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND & THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TUHIN KUMAR GEDELA WRIT PETITION NO.14908 OF 2026 ORDER: (Per Hon’ble Sri Justice Battu Devanand) During the course of hearing of this case today, Ms. V. Dyumani, learned counsel for the respondent Bank, would submit that in view of the subsequent developments happened during the pendency of the writ petition that the loan account is closed after clearing the entire dues by the petitioners, no cause survives in the present writ petition. 2) Placing the statement of the learned counsel for the respondent bank on record. 3) Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. 4) There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________ JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND _____________________________ JUSTICE TUHIN KUMAR GEDELA Dated: 16.09.2026 PGR 5 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND & THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TUHIN KUMAR GEDELA W.P.No.14908 of 2026 Dt. 16.09.2026 PGR