HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No. - 9632 of 2026 Court No. - 71 HON'BLE RAJIV LOCHAN SHUKLA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, and learned A.G.A. for the State as well as perused the record. 2. The present anticipatory bail application has been filed on behalf of the applicant in Case Crime No. 714 of 2025, under Section 109 (1) of BNS, P.S. Sikandra, District Agra, with a prayer to enlarge him on anticipatory bail as the applicant apprehend his arrest in the abovementioned case. 3. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant is absolutely innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present case. He has nothing to do with the alleged offence in spite of that the police are trying to arrest the applicant. The first information report was lodged after two days, which has not been sufficiently explained by the prosecution. The alleged incident had taken place on 4.11.2025 at 20:00 hours, whereas the first information report was lodged on 6.11.2025 at 12:29 hours. The applicant and two other co- accused were nominated in the first information report and general and omnibus allegations have been levelled against the applicant. As per the injury report of the injured Bhagat Singh, he sustained as many as five injuries but all the injuries were simple in nature. The victim admitted in his affidavit that the injuries were simple in nature, therefore, he did not go for further medical examination of the injuries. It is further submitted that no offence under Section 109 BNS is made out and the offence would not travel beyond Sections 115 and 118 Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Shashi Kumar Tiwari Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Ankit .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s) BNS, which was wrongly imposed in order to take the applicant behind the bar. The applicant has no criminal antecedent to his credit. Learned counsel for the applicant further submits that the applicant undertakes to cooperate during investigation and trial and shall appear as and when required by the Investigating Agency or the Court concerned. It has also been stated that, in case the applicant is granted anticipatory bail, he shall not misuse the liberty of bail, shall cooperate with the investigation, and shall abide by all the conditions that may be imposed by the Court. 4. It is further submitted that co accused Sumit and Anshu Solanki @ Ashwani Solanki have been granted anticipatory bail by this Court vide orders dated 21.07.2026, passed in Criminal Misc Anticipatory Bail Applications U/s 482 BNSS No. 5026 of 2026 and 6851 of 2026 respectively, and the case of the applicant stands on similar footing. 5. On the other hand, learned A.G.A. has opposed the application for anticipatory bail, however, he does not dispute the factual aspect. 6. I have considered the submissions made by the Learned counsels for the parties. 7. Taking note of the entire facts and circumstances of the case, especially the fact that the case of the applicant stands on similar footing, I deem it appropriate to enlarge applicant on anticipatory bail. 8. In view of the above, the anticipatory bail application of the applicant is allowed. 9. In the event of the arrest of the applicant- Ankit, he shall be released forthwith in the aforesaid case crime on anticipatory bail on furnishing of his personal bond and surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Station House Officer of the police station/Court concerned with the following conditions:- i. the applicant shall make themselves available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required; ii. that the applicant shall not, directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to NABAIL No. 9632 of 2026 2 the Court or to any police officer; iii. that the applicant shall not leave India without the previous permission of the Court; iv. that the applicant shall not pressurize/intimidate the prosecution witness; 10. In case of breach of any of the above conditions, the Court concerned shall be at liberty to cancel the bail. October 1, 2026 RavindraKSingh NABAIL No. 9632 of 2026 3 (Rajiv Lochan Shukla,J.) Digitally signed by :- RAVINDRA KUMAR SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad