SIKANDER ISMAILBHAI VORA v. AHMEDABAD URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
SCA/7621/2026 · 2026-05-25
J L Odedra
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 1080 (GUJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 1080 (GUJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 7621 of 2026 ========================================================== SIKANDER ISMAILBHAI VORA & ANR. Versus AHMEDABAD URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ANR. ========================================================== Appearance: JENIL M SHAH(7840) for the Petitioner(s) No. 1,2 MR ABHISHEK JAIN, ASST.GOVERNMENT PLEADER for the Respondent(s) No. 2 MR ANUJ K TRIVEDI(6251) for the Respondent(s) No. 1 ========================================================== CORAM:HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE J. L. ODEDRA
Date : 25/05/2026
ORAL ORDER
1. Aggrieved by the factum of imminent laying of the drainage pipelines, at the site of proposed petrol pump, the petitioner has preferred these proceedings.
2. During the course of the arguments, learned advocate for respondent No.1 has submitted that as such, vis-a-vis the proposed petrol pump, no development application has been made by petitioner under the Gujarat Town Planning and Urban Development Act.
3. On the other hand, the submission of the learned advocate for the petitioner is that he has made a representation urging inter alia that the laying of the drainage pipeline is p. 2 without issuance of any notice, and without complying with the principles of natural justice.
4. On overall consideration of the matter, respondent No.1 authority is directed to consider the representation produced by the petitioner at Annexure-H to the petition preferably within the period of fifteen (15) days from the date of the receipt of the copy of this order. The petitioner shall be at a liberty to prefer appropriate proceedings, in case he is aggrieved by the said decision. Obviously, the representation shall be decided after giving an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner.
5. The petition stands disposed of in aforesaid terms.
(J. L. ODEDRA, J) SUDHIR