Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 10793 (KAR)

SMT KAMARUNNISSA v. SRI MUNIKRISHNA

MFA/1361/2026 · 2026-03-14

Lok Adalath

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 HIGH COURT LEGAL SERVICES COMMITTEE, BENGALURU BEFORE THE NATIONAL LOK ADALAT IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 14TH DAY OF MARCH, 2026 CONCILIATORS PRESENT THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT BANERJI & MR.H.PAVANA CHANDRA SHETTY., MEMBER M.F.A.No.1361/2026 (Lok Adalat No.1186/2026) BETWEEN: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. SMT. KAMARUNNISSA W/O LATE ABDUL VAHAB AGED ABOUT 72 YEARS AFROZ PASHA S/O. LATE ABDUL VAHAB AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS NASREEN TAJ W/O. SALEEM PASHA AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS LATHEEFA TAJ D/O. LATE ABDUL VAHAB W/O R.S KHADER AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS R/AT NO.43/2, 9th CROSS VENKOJI RAO KHANE MADINANAGAR, BOMMANAHALLI BENGALURU WASEEM BASHA S/O LATE ABDUL VAHAB AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS Digitally signed by DEEPU M Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA 2 6. 7. ANEESHA D/O LATE ABDUL VAHAB UN-MARRIED AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS B.B AYESHA D/O LATE ABDUL VAHAB W/O AMJAD KHAN AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS R/AT NAYAKARAHALLI KOLAR TALUK, KOLAR APPELLANTS 1, 2, 3 AND 5 ARE R/AT OLD MADRAS ROAD 3RD BLOCK, OLD TOWN BETHAMANGALA – 563 116 K.G.F. TALUK ..APPELLANTS (BY SRI. K.VISHWANATHA, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. 2. SRI. MUNIKRISHNA S/O NANJUNDA REDDY AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS R/AT NO.270, NEAR ITI LAYOUT A NARAYANAPURA, BENGALURU – 560 016 (RC OWNER OF EICHER GOODS CARRIER BEARING REG. NO.KA-23/A-7450) ROYAL SUNDARAM GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED REP. BY ITS BRANCH MANAGER BRANCH OFFICE NO.30, 3RD FLOOR JNR CITY CENTRE, RAJA RAM MOHAN ROY ROAD SAMPANGIRAM NAGAR BENGALURU – 560 027 CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE & POLICY NO.VGT0167241000100 VALID FROM 08-06-2022 TO MIDNIGHT OF 07-06-2023 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. JAGADISH P S., ADVOCATE FOR R2) 3 THIS MFA IS FILED U/S.173(1) OF MV ACT, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED 13.11.2025 PASSED IN MVC NO.241/2022 ON THE FILE OF THE III ADDL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, KOLAR (SITTING AT K.G.F.), PARTLY ALLOWING THE CLAIM PETITION FOR COMPENSATION AND SEEKING ENHANCEMENT OF COMPENSATION. THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR CONCILIATION BEFORE NATIONAL LOK ADALAT, THE FOLLOWING CONCILIATION ORDER IS PASSED: CONCILIATION ORDER A joint memo is filed in which it is stated as follows: “ The MFA filed against the Judgment and Award in M.V.C.241/2022 on the File of the MACT, KOLAR (KGF) has been referred to this Lok Adalat by the Hon’ble High Court U/S.20 of the Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987. The parties to the appeal have settled their claim before the Lok Adalat on the following terms: The Appellant/s – Claimant/s has/have agreed to receive and Respondent – ROYAL SUNDARAM GEN. INS. CO. LTD., has agreed to pay a lump-sum of Rs.7,70,000/- (Rupees Seven Lakh Seventy Thousand Only), in addition to what has been awarded by the Tribunal, in full and final settlement of the claim. The Respondent ROYAL SUNDARAM GEN. INS. CO. LTD., has agreed to deposit the said amount, before the Tribunal, within six weeks from the date of preparation of award failing which the said amount shall carry interest at 9% p.a. from the date of default, till the date of deposit. The parties are not entitled for any cost. The parties to this appeal have set their hands to this settlement before the Lok Adalat in the presence of Conciliators on this 14.03.2026 at Bengaluru Bench.” 4 2. The memo is accepted and in view of the settlement, this appeal is disposed of. It is directed that the award be prepared no later than two months from today. The amount awarded by the Tribunal is permitted to be withdrawn by the claimants forthwith as per law. The amount that is settled today is permitted to be withdrawn on deposit of the amount by the Insurance Company as per law. Sd/- JUDGE Sd/- MEMBER KG