Satpal Kumar v. Mukesh Kumar Cr.MPM No. 192 of 2026 25.05.2026 Present: Mr. Arun Raj, Advocate, for the applicant/petitioner. Mr. Nitin Rishi, Advocate, for the non- applicant/respondent. Cr.MP No. 487 of 2026 For the reasons stated in the application, same is allowed and delay, if any, in refiling the appeal after removal of the objections, is condoned. The application is disposed of. Cr.MPM No. 192 of 2026 By way of instant application filed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, prayer has been made by the applicant/petitioner for condonation of delay in maintaining the accompanying appeal, which is barred by limitation. Pursuant to notices issued in the instant proceedings, Mr. Nitin Rishi, Advocate, has filed power of attorney on behalf of the respondent. He states that he does not intend to file reply and has no objection to the afore prayer made by the applicant. Accordingly, for the reasons stated in the application, this Court is convinced and satisfied that delay in maintaining the accompanying appeal is neither intentional nor willful, rather same has occurred on account of circumstances, which were completely beyond the control of the applicant, as such, delay, which has been sufficiently explained, is condoned. The application is disposed of. Cr.Appeal No. of 2026 Be registered. Admit. Record be called for. List for hearing on 20.7.2026. May 25, 2026 (Sandeep Sharma), manjit Judge