Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:RJ-JP:28290] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 7341/2026 URN: CRLMB / 13364U / 2026 Ghanshyam S/o Sukhram, Aged About 50 Years, R/o Bagdin Ka Bas, Baswa, Tehsil Baswa, District Dausa. (At Present Confined In Sub Jail Bandikui, District Dausa). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent Connected With S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 11026/2026 URN: CRLMB / 20393U / 2026 Ramjilal @ Pappu S/o Sukhram, Aged About 60 Years, R/o Janta Colony, Pahalwan Ka Kua Ke Pass, Mugaska, Alwar, Police Station Aravali Vihar, District Alwar, Presently Residing At Bagdin Ka Bas, Baswa, Tehsil Baswa, District Dausa. (At Present Confined In Sub Jail Bandikui, District Dausa). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. RK Mathur, Sr. Adv. Mr. Umesh Kumar Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Jaiprakash Tiwari, PP Mr. Koushal Bhardwaj HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR
Order 22/07/2026
1. The petitioners have filed these bail applications under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.215/2025 registered at Police Station Baswa, District Dausa for offences under Sections 191(2),
[2026:RJ-JP:28290] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-7341/2026] 191(3), 190, 115(2), 126(2), 109(1), 352, 351(2), 103(1), 125(a) of BNS, 2023 and Sections 3, 25, 5 and 27 of Arms Act, 2019.
2. Since both these bail applications arise out of common FIR, hence, they are being decided by this common order.
3. Heard learned counsels for the petitioners, learned Public Prosecutor as well as learned counsel for the complainant and perused the material available on record.
4. Learned counsels for the petitioners contend that the petitioners have falsely been implicated in these cases. It is submitted that the specific allegation of causing the death of the deceased-Kailashi, by using a firearm is attributed to co-accused Rajendra. It is further submitted that though allegations have been levelled against petitioner Ghanshyam for inflicting injuries upon the injured Badam and against petitioner Ramjilal for causing injuries to the injured Gopal but the medical reports of both injured persons reveal that each sustained only one grievous injury. No medical opinion has been placed on record to indicate that the said injuries were dangerous to life. It is further contended that co-accused Mukesh has already been enlarged on bail by the Coordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated
24.04.2026. Similarly, the other co-accusedBhagwati, Guddi, and Rajanti were also granted the benefit of bail by this Court on
16.01.2026. Petitioners are behind the bars since 06.02.2026 though two cases have been reported against petitioner Ramjilal. Charge-sheet has already been filed. The statement of material witnesses from PW-1 to PW-6 have been recorded. The trial of the case will take considerable time, therefore, no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioners in further custody and
[2026:RJ-JP:28290] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-7341/2026] on the ground of parity with other co-accused, the bail applications deserves to be allowed.
5. Learned Public Prosecutor and learned counsel for the complainant have vehemently opposed the bail applications of the petitioners.
6. On consideration of the rival submissions and material available on record and in the light of submissions made by
learned counsel for the petitioners but without expressing any opinion on merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioners.
7. Consequently, the bail applications under Section 483 B.N.S.S. are allowed and it is directed that the petitioners Ghanshyam S/o Sukhram & Ramjilal @ Pappu S/o Sukhram be released on bail provided each of them furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court with the stipulation that each of them shall appear before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing till conclusion of the trial.
(PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J Chandan/100-101