RAMLAKHAN SONKAR ( LEGAL HEIR OF FULMATBAI SONKAR) v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH
WPC/1710/2026 · 2026-04-19
Shri Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 10784 (CHH) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 10784 (CHH) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
2026:CGHC:17822
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 1710 of 2026 Ramlakhan Sonkar ( Legal Heir Of Fulmatbai Sonkar) S/o Late Shri Ramlal Sonkar Aged About 63 Years R/o Sonkarpara Purani Basti, Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.)
--- Petitioner versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Revenue Department, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Naya Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) 2 - The Upper Collector Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.)
--- Respondent(s)
For Petitioner : Ms. Nupoor Sonkar, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Saumitra Kesharwani, Panel Lawyer Hon'ble Shri Justice Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi
Order On Board 20-4-2026
1. The petitioner has preferred this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking following reliefs :- 10.1 That, the Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to call the entire records relating to the case of the petitioner. 10.2 That, issue an appropriate writ, order or direction directing the Respondent authorities to decide the pending proceedings relating to correction of Khasra Nos. 451 and AVANISH KUMAR PATHAK Digitally signed by AVANISH KUMAR PATHAK Date: 2026.04.22 15:27:17 +0530
2 452 within a fixed time frame, preferably within a period of three months, in accordance with law. 10.3 Any other relief deems fit in the present facts acts and and circumstances of this case may also be awarded to the petitioner.
2.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that, petitioner’s ancestors were in continuous possession of Khasra No. 451 situated at village Sarona, Patwari Halka No. 56, RNM Raipura, Tahsil and Distt. Raipur. As per original settlement record and map prepared during year 1939- 40, settlement, location, identity and boundaries of aforesaid land were clearly demarcated and correspond with the physical position on the spot, which were also supported from old revenue record and old registered sale deed dated 17-7-1989. During the process of digitization and preparation of updated revenue records and online maps, there was clerical error occurred whereby Khasra No. 451 and Khasra No. 452 were wrongly interchanged in the revenue record, resulting in serious confusion regarding identity and location of the land. Therefore, petitioner filed an application under Section 107(5) of the CG Land Revenue Code, 1959 along with all necessary documents before the Upper Collector, Raipur on 14-7-2025, which was registered as Case No. 202507113000052/A-6, which is pending consideration since 14-7-2025 and has not been concluded yet. Hence, she prays that respondent No. 2/Upper Collector, Raipur be directed to conclude proceeding of aforesaid revenue case within stipulated period.
3.
Learned counsel for the State has no objection to allow above limited
3 prayer.
4. Having considered the limited prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioner for issuance of direction to respondent No. 2 to decide the revenue case No. 202507113000052/A-6, this petition is disposed of at this stage, with the direction to respondent no. 2/Upper Collector, Raipur to decide the Revenue case No. 202507113000052/A-6 pending before it in accordance with law, as early as possible preferably within a period of 90 days from the date of receipt/ submission of a copy of this order.
5. With the above observations and directions, this writ petition stands
disposed of.
6. Pending interlocutory application(s), if any, stands disposed of. Sd/- (Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi) Judge pathak