Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 10784 (CAL)

ALPANA MONDAL @ ALPANA MANDAL @ ALOPNA MONDAL AND ORS. v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL

CRM (A)/270/2026 · 2026-02-09

Jay Sengupta

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

AD 46 February 9, 2026 Ct. 28 SG CRM(A) 270 of 2026 Reject An application for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with Raghunathganj P.S. Case No.649 of 2025 dated 18.05.2025 under Sections 329(4)/117(2)/118(1)/118(2)/ 109(1)/3(5) of the BNS, 2023. And In the matter of: Alpana Mondal @ Alpana Mandal @ Alopna Mondal and others … petitioners Mr. Kusal Kumar Mukherjee Mr. Sayan Das Mr. Arijit Bose … for the petitioners Mr. Rudradipta Nandy Mr. Shiladitya Banerjee ... for the State Heard learned counsels for the parties. Perused the case diary. Considering the incriminating materials available in the case diary including the post-mortem report and the statements of neighbours made before the police and the learned Magistrate, I do not consider this to be a fit case for granting anticipatory bail. The application for anticipatory bail is, thus, rejected. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance of requisite formalities. [ (Jay Sengupta, J.)