NIRMAL BURAI @ NIRMAL KUMAR BURAI v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ANR
CRM (A)/287/2026 · 2026-02-10
Jay Sengupta
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 10783 (CAL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 10783 (CAL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
10.02.2026 Court No.28 Item No.43 tbsr Reject CRM (A) 287 of 2026 In Re: - An application for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with Daspur P.S. Case No.595 of 2025 dated 16.11.2025 under Sections 329(4), 115(2), 76 & 3(5) of the BNS, 2023 read with Sections 8 & 12 of the Protection of the Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012. And In the matter of: Nirmal Burai @ Nirmal Kumar Burai & Anr. ….Petitioners. Mr. Siddhartha Sarkar Mr. Sourav Gupta
…for the petitioners.
Mr. S.S. Imam Mr. Akash Ganguly
…..for the State.
Mr. Satyendra Agarwal Mr. Tarak Nath Sarkar Mr. Goutam Malick
….for the de facto complainant.
Heard the learned counsels for the petitioners, the de facto complainant and the State.
Perused the case diary.
The prosecution case is that the petitioners were two carpenters who had come to work in the house of the de facto complainant and, taking advantage of the absence of others, they allegedly sexually assaulted the 12 year old survivor.
Considering the serious nature of allegations, the incriminating materials available in the case diary including the statements of the alleged survivor and the medical report, I do not consider this to be a fit case for granting anticipatory bail.
The application for anticipatory bail is, thus, rejected.
2
Urgent photostat certified copies of this order may be delivered to the learned Advocates for the parties, if applied for, upon compliance of all formalities.
(Jay Sengupta, J.)