- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:24582 RSA No. 309 of 2010 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 30TH DAY OF APRIL, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO.309 OF 2010 (SP) BETWEEN: SHRI. RAMANNA SINCE DECEASED BY HIS L.R’S 1. SHRI. VENKATESHAPPA S/O LATE RAMANNA AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS 2. SHRI R. CHANDRAPPA S/O LATE RAMANNA AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS 3. SHRI. R. KRISHNAPPA S/O LATE RAMANNA AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS 4. SHRI. R. NAGARAJAPPA S/O LATE RAMANNA AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS 5. SHRI. R. NARAYANASWAMY S/O LATE RAMANNA AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS NO.1 TO 5 ARE R/AT GOPASANDRA VILLAGE, TEKAL HOBLI, MALUR TALUK 6. SMT. PADMAMMA D/O LATE RAMANNA W/O ERAPPA Digitally signed by MALATESH K C Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:24582 RSA No. 309 of 2010 AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS R/AT KEMPANAHALLI VILLAGE, TEKAL HOBLI, MALUR TALUK 7. SMT. SHAKUNTALA D/O RAMANNA AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS R/AT JANGANAHALLI VILLAGE, TEKAL HOBLI, MALUR …APPELLANTS (BY SRI V.VISHWANATH SETTY, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SHRI. KALLAPPA S/O LATE KEMPANNA SINCE DECEASED BY HIS LRs 1(a) SMT.LAKSHMAMMA W/O LATE KALLAPPA AGED ABOUT 75 YEARS 1(b) SRI NARAYANASWAMY S/O LATE KALLAPPA AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS 1(c) SRI RAMACHANDRA S/O LATE KALLAPPA AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS ALL ARE R/AT: HALLEBAALLAHALLI VILLAGE TEKAL HOBLI, MALURU TALUK KOLAR DISTRICT- 563 137 …RESPONDENTS [BY SRI G.VIKARAM, ADVOCATE FOR R1(A TO C)] THIS RSA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 100 OF CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 30.10.2009 PASSED IN R.A.NO.151/2002 ON THE FILE - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:24582 RSA No. 309 of 2010 OF THE II ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE (SR.DN) KOLAR, ALLOWING THE APPEAL AND SETTING ASIDE THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 10.7.2002 PASSED IN O.S.NO.320/1993 ON THE FILE OF THE ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE (JR.DN) MALUR. THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR REPORTING SETTLEMENT, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA ORAL JUDGMENT Learned counsel for the appellants has filed memo which reads as under: “The LRs of the appellants above named humbly begs to submit that in view of the settlement arrived between the appellants and Smt. Sheelamma, who are the parties in RFA No.308/2010, who has purchased the suit schedule properties from the deceased respondent – Kallappa. Now in pursuance of the amicable settlement arrived between the LRs of the appellants and Smt. Susheelamma, the only respondent in RFA No.308/2010 and in pursuance of the same, the compromise petition is filed before this Hon’ble Court. Hence the appellants humbly prays that this Hon’ble Court may be pleased to dismiss the above appeal in view of the settlement arrived between the appellants and Smt. Sheelamma, in the interest of justice and equity.” - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:24582 RSA No. 309 of 2010 2. Placing the memo on record, appeal stands dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- (V SRISHANANDA) JUDGE MR List No.: 2 Sl No.: 55