1 904 CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 224 OF 2008 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 904 CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 224 OF 2008 IN WP/3950/2000 ANILKUMAR RAMNARAYAN AGRAWAL AND OTHERS VERSUS STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS ... Adv. A. S. Bajaj, Advocate for the Petitioners Adv. N. B. Patil, AGP for Respondents-State ... WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2588 OF 2010 IN CP/224/2008 THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS VERSUS ANILKUMAR RAMNARAYAN AGRAWAL AND ORS … Adv. N. B. Patil, AGP for applicant-State Adv. A. S. Bajaj, Advocate for Respondents ... CORAM : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE AND VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV, JJ. DATED : 22/09/2026 Order ( Per Vaishali Patil-Jadhav, J. ) . The learned advocate for the petitioners submits that the order under contempt is complied with. 2. In view of the same, nothing survives in the contempt petition and the same stands disposed of along with pending civil application, if any. ( VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV, J. ) ( SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, J. ) shivani/ 2026:BHC-AUG:43380