RADHEY SHYAM AND 2 OTHERS v. STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND 2 OTHERS
CRLP/23019/2026 · 2026-09-29
Abdul Shahid, Mayur Jain Jt Registrar J Listing
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 10769 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 10769 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 23019 of 2026 Court No. - 48 HON'BLE CHANDRA DHARI SINGH, J.
HON'BLE ABDUL SHAHID, J.
1. Mr. Sandeep Kumar Chaurasiya, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners, after some length of arguments, without pressing the matter on merits prayed for leave to withdraw the present petition with liberty to avail appropriate remedy available under the law, as advised.
2. Learned A.G.A. appearing on behalf of the State-respondents and Mr. Puneet Kumar Shukla, learned counsel for the respondent no. 3 vehemently opposed the petition on merits, but have not objected the innocuous prayer made by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners for granting leave to withdraw the instant writ petition.
3. Taking into consideration the submissions and prayer made by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners and no objection made by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State-respondents, leave granted.
4. Without entering into merits of the case, the instant writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for.
September 30, 2026 Saurabh Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Anubhav Sonkar, Ashutosh Gupta, Sandeep Kumar Chaurasiya Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A., Puneet Kumar Shukla (Abdul Shahid,J.) (Chandra Dhari Singh,J.) Radhey Shyam And 2 Others .....Petitioner(s) State Of Uttar Pradesh And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SAURABH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad