Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 10767 (BOM)

SHESHARAO BABURAO RAUTRAO AND OTHERS v. YAMUNABAI BABURAO RAUTRAO DIED 2. GANGASAGAR SUDHAKAR GARAD

CA/10903/2026 · 2026-09-22

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 1023 ca.10903.26.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD. 1023 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 10903 OF 2026 IN SA/206/2016 SHESHARAO BABURAO RAUTRAO AND OTHERS VERSUS SMT YAMUNABAI BABURAO RAUTRAO DIED SOW. GANGASAGAR SUDHAKAR GARAD ... Advocate for Applicant : Mr. Sunil V. Warad. Advocate for Respondent : Mr. H. P. Jadhav. ... CORAM : SANJAY A. DESHMUKH, J. DATE : 22nd September, 2026. P.C.: 1 This is an application for restoration of the appeal, which was dismissed for non-compliance and default, as per the order dated 28th August, 2026, passed by this Court. 2 Heard the learned counsel for the parties. Perused the application. 3 The learned counsel for the applicants submits that he had filed pursis informing this Court that the legal representatives of respondent No.1 are already on record. Therefore, the steps were not taken. 4 The learned counsel for respondent strongly opposed the application. 2026:BHC-AUG:43051 2 1023 ca.10903.26.odt 5 Considering the reasons stated in the application, the application deserves to be allowed in the interest of justice. The application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (B). The learned counsel for the applicants / appellants is directed to bracket the name of respondent No.1 forthwith. 6 List the appeal on 5th October, 2026, at 02:30 pm. [ SANJAY A. DESHMUKH, J. ] nga