Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 10763 (AP)

ATHIPALLI SIVA PRASAD REDDY v. G.SAI PRASAD, IAS

CC/834/2025 · 2026-09-15

Venkateswarlu Nimmagadda

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010150632025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE 16th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA CONTEMPT CASE NO: 834 OF 2025 Between: 1. ATHIPALLI SIVA PRASAD REDDY, S/o. Veera Reddy, Aged about 55 years, Occ. President WUA Kovur Mandal, R/o. 7-7-17, Attipallivari Street, Kovuru Village and Mandal, SPSR Nellore District. ...Petitioner AND 1. G SAI PRASAD IAS, Principal Secretary to Government of A.P, Water Resource Department, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravati, Guntur District. 2. Piyush Kumar I A S, Principal Secretary to Government of A.P, Finance and Planning Department, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravati, Guntur District. 3. S Dese Naik, Superintendent Engineer, Irrigation and Command Area Development, Irrigation Circle, Nellore, SPSR Nellore District. 4. P M Khan, Executive Engineer, Drainage Division, Nellore, Nellore Central Division, Nellore, SPSR Nellore District. ...Respondents Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to pleased to issue summons to the Respondents upon due 2 enquiry may be pleased to punish the Respondents for contempt of court under section 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, for their wilful disobedience of order dated 19.12.2023 passed in Writ Petition No 17139 of 2023 on the file of this Hon'ble court and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: SIVAPRASAD REDDY VENATI Counsel for the Respondents: BH RAMA KRISHNA NAIK The Court made the following order: 3 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA CONTEMPT CASE NO: 834 OF 2025 ORDER: This contempt case is filed against the respondents for willful disobedience of the orders dated 19.12.2023 passed by this Court in W.P.No.17139 of 2023. Heard Sri Ramji Varma, learned counsel representing the learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the respondents. When the matter is taken up for hearing, Sri Ramji Varma, learned counsel representing the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the respondents have complied with the orders dated 19.12.2023 passed by this Court in W.P.No.17139 of 2023. Hence, no further orders are required to be passed in the contempt case. Recording the said submission, the Contempt Case is closed. No order as to costs. Consequently, Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending in the contempt case shall stand closed. ________________________________ VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA, J 16.09.2026 TTPPSS 4 40 HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA (closed) CONTEMPT CASE NO: 834 OF 2025 16.09.2026 TTPPSS