[2026:RJ-JP:28203] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 8940/2026 URN: CW / 19830U / 2026 Yuvraj Singh S/o Ram Singh Rathod, Aged About 30 Years, Resident of Rajput Mohalla, Harnawa Patti, Harnawa, Nagaur District Nagaur Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus 1. Yes Bank Ltd, Through Its President And Regional Head Regional Office Address At Ground Floor, Plot No O-19A, Ashok Marg, Near Ahinsa Circle, C-Scheme, Jaiur. 2. Yes Bank Limited, Through Its Managing Director And Ceo At Yes Bank House,off Western Express Highway, Santacruz East, Mumbai, Maharashtra, 400055. 3. Yes Bank Limited, Through Its Head - Product, Portfolio And Services, Merchant Acquiring At Tower, Ifc - 2, 15Th Floor, Senapati Bapat Marg, Elphinstone (W), Mumbai 400013. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Govind Upadhyay For Respondent(s) : Ms. Pragya Singh for Mr. Abhishek Bhandari HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND SHARMA Order 22/07/2026 1. This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner with the following prayers:- “It is, therefore, humbly prayed that yours Lordships may graciously be pleased to accept and allow this writ petition by calling the entire record and after perusal of the same: i) By appropriate writ, order, or direction directing the Respondents to immediately release/process/pay the amount lying withheld in the Petitioner’s Yes Bank credit card account bearing No. 4046 3860 7292 4260. ii) By appropriate writ, order, or direction the respondents may be directed to pay the interest on the [2026:RJ-JP:28203] (2 of 2) [CW-8940/2026] amount they have held without any reason at the rate of 15 percent per annum. iii) By appropriate writ, order, or direction the respondents may be directed to Award compensation for mental agony, harassment, and financial loss suffered by the Petitioner due to arbitrary action of the Respondents. iv) Any other appropriate order or direction which is deemed just and proper in the facts and circumstance by this Hon’ble Court may also be passed in favour of the petitioner’s committee.” 2. On perusal of the memo of writ petition, it is reflected that the present writ petition has been filed by the petitioner against Yes Bank Limited, which is admittedly a private bank, having no deep and pervasive financial or administrative control of the Government, nor has been engaged in discharging any sovereign activities. 3. In view of above, the respondents- Yes Bank Limited does not fall within the definition of State as given under Article 12 of the Constitution of India. Therefore, the respondents are not amenable to the writ jurisdiction of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. 4. For the reasons mentioned in above, the writ petition filed by the petitioner is totally misconceived, and is not maintainable and the same is hereby dismissed. 5. It is made clear that dismissal of this writ petition would not curtail the rights of the petitioner to avail the alternative remedies as per law. 6. Pending application(s), if any, also stand(s) disposed of. (ANAND SHARMA),J 17/DIVYA