Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 1076 (RAJ)

JANU MAHAWAR D/O SHRI MOHANLAL MAHAWAR, v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLW/406/2026 · 2026-03-19

Anil Kumar Upman

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:11922] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Writ Petition No. 406/2026 1. Janu Mahawar D/o Shri Mohanlal Mahawar, Aged About 22 Years, Resident Of Mahawar Mohlla, Borai, Jaipur, District Jaipur. 2. Susheel Kumar Mahawar Son Of Sri Narayan Mahawar, Aged About 24 Years, R/o Mahawar Mohalla, Borai, Padasol, Jaipur, District Jaipur. ----Petitioners Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Secretary Home Department, Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. Director General Of Police, Rajasthan, Jaipur. 3. Superintendent Of Police, Jaipur Rural District Jaipur. 4. S.h.o., Police Station Bassi, District Jaipur. 5. Gourav Son Of Sohanlal, Resident Of Mahawar Mohalla, Borai, Jaipur, District Jaipur. 6. Amit Mahawar Son Of Duli Chand Mahawar, Resident Of Mahawar Mohalla, Borai, Jaipur, District Jaipur. 7. Sumit Mahawar Son Of Ghanshyam Mahawar, Resident Of Mahawar Mohalla, Borai, Jaipur, District Jaipur. 8. Satyanarayan Son Of Sohanlal, Resident Of Jayanti Nagar, Meena Padli, District Jaipur. 9. Ramgopal Son Of Sohanlal, Resident Of Jayanti Nagar, Meena Padli, District Jaipur. 10. Bharat Mahawar Son Of Ramgopal, Resident Of Jayanti Nagar, Meena Padli, District Jaipur. 11. Rahul Mahawar Son Of Bihari Lal Mahawar, Resident Of Jayanti Nagar, Meena Padli, District Jaipur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Krishn Gopal [2026:RJ-JP:11922] (2 of 3) [CRLW-406/2026] Mr. Rakesh Kumar Meena Mr. Vikram Kumar Khinchi For Respondent(s) : Mr. M.S. Shekhawat, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 19/03/2026 1. Defects pointed out by the Registry are overruled. 2. Petitioners are major and present in person. They have duly been identified by their counsel. 3. This criminal writ petition has been filed by petitioners seeking protection from the private respondent Nos.5 to 11 as they are apprehending danger to their life and liberty at the hands of private respondents. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that both the petitioners are mature enough to take decision of their life. It is submitted that petitioners have entered into marriage as per Hindu Rites and Customs at Nagar Arya Samaj Sansthan, Bapu Nagar, Lal Kothi, Tonk Road, Jaipur on 05.03.2026 and same has been registered on 05.03.2026. The certificate of registration of marriage of the petitioners is annexed with this petition. Counsel further submits that petitioners are living peacefully as husband and wife but respondent Nos.5 to 11 are not happy with their marriage and petitioners are receiving continuous threats from the private respondents, so they prayed for protection. 5. In view of the above factual averments, petitioners are directed to file appropriate application seeking protection before respondent No.4-Station House Officer, Police Station Bassi, District Jaipur and respondent no.4 is directed to provide [2026:RJ-JP:11922] (3 of 3) [CRLW-406/2026] protection to the petitioners, if any application is filed before him and he would ensure that no harm is caused to the petitioners. 6. The criminal writ petition is, accordingly, disposed of. 7. Stay application and pending application(s), if any, stand disposed of. 8. However, it is made clear that this order will not affect the civil/ criminal proceedings, if any, in the present matter. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J CHARU SONI /190