SANDEEP KUMAR INDORIA S/O JUGAL KISHORE v. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMB/9413/2026 · 2026-07-27
Pramil Kumar Mathur
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 10757 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 10757 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:RJ-JP:28895] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 9413/2026 CNR: RJHC020568002026 | URN: CRLMB / 17364U / 2026
1. Sandeep Kumar Indoria S/o Jugal Kishore, Aged About 29 Years, R/o Near Canera Bank, Ward No. 17, Fathepur Shekhawat, Police Statoin Fathepur Kotwali, District Sikar.
2. Lalit Kumar S/o Ramchandra, Aged About 33 Years, R/o- Ward No. 24, Nyariyo Ka Mohalla, Fatehpur Shekhawat, Police Station Fathepur Kotwali District Sikar. ----Petitioners Versus The State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Atul Saxena Mr. Sanjay Kumar Shukla For Respondent(s) : Mr. Jai Prakash Tiwari HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR
Order 27/07/2026
1. Apprehending their arrest in connection with FIR No.0127/2026 registered at Police Station Fatehpur Kotwali, District Sikar for the offences under Sections 318(4), 112(2), 61(2)(a) of BNS and 66D of I.T. Act and Section 3 and 4 of Rajasthan Public Gambling Ordinance, 1949, the petitioners have preferred this bail application under Section 482 BNSS.
2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record.
3.
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have been falsely implicated in this case. He further submits that the complainant has no locus standi to lodge the FIR
[2026:RJ-JP:28895] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-9413/2026] under Section 318(4) of BNS as there is no cheating committed by the petitioners against him and no person independent registered complainant against petitioners. The matter pertains to online gaming under Section 3/4 of RPGO which is bailable one. He contended that custodial interrogation is not required. Hence, the bail application of the petitioners may be allowed.
5. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application.
6. Considering the fact that the petitioners are ready and willing to co-operate with the investigation of the case, without commenting anything on the merits/demerits of the case, I deem it just and proper to allow the bail application of the petitioners.
7. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 482 BNSS is allowed and it is ordered that in the event of arrest of the petitioners-Sandeep Kumar Indoria S/o Jugal Kishore and Lalit Kumar S/o Ramchandra, they shall be released on bail on their furnishing personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- each with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the S.H.O/I.O/Arresting Officer of the concerned Police Station on the following conditions:- (i) that the petitioners shall make himself available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required; (ii) that the petitioners shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case
[2026:RJ-JP:28895] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-9413/2026] so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the court or any police officer, and (iii) that the petitioners shall not leave India without previous permission of the court.
(PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J Anil/39