ALI AHMD AND 2 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER
A227/13651/2026 · 2026-09-29
Rohit Ranjan Agarwal
Original Suitbody2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 10756 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 10756 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 13651 of 2026 Court No. - 9 HON'BLE ROHIT RANJAN AGARWAL, J.
1. This is defendants' petition. In the suit filed by plaintiffs-respondents, an application for grant of temporary injunction 6C was moved in which notices were issued to defendants-petitioners and an ad interim injunction was granted. According to petitioners, they have appeared in the matter and filed their objections, which are pending consideration.
2. As no useful purpose would be served in keeping the matter pending, the writ petition is being disposed of, at the admission stage, without calling for counter affidavit or issuing notice to private respondents, with a direction upon court concerned to decide the 6-C application filed in Original Suit No. 185 of 2025, considering the objection filed by petitioner under Order XXXIX Rule 4 CPC, in accordance with law, after hearing all affected parties, preferably within a period of one month, from the date of production of certified copy of this order.
3. With the aforesaid directions, writ petition stands disposed of.
4. It is made clear that this Court has not adjudicated the matter on merits. September 30, 2026 (V. S. SINGH) Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ghazala Bano Quadri Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Rohit Ranjan Agarwal,J.) Ali Ahmd And 2 Others .....Petitioner(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- VIDYA SAGAR SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad