Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 10755 (BOM)

MUKHTAR NUR SAYYED v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

BA/1658/2026 · 2026-09-15

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

-1- NOB-6-BA-1658-2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1658 OF 2026 MUKHTAR NUR SAYYED VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA .... Advocate for Applicant : Mr. Nilesh S. Ghanekar a/w Mr. Dhanraj Ingole and Mr. Shaikh Sohail Subhedar APP for Respondents/State : Mr. V.K.Kotecha .… CORAM : HITEN S. VENEGAVKAR, J. DATED : 15th SEPTEMBER 2026 PER COURT : 1. Not on board. Upon mentioning taken on board. 2. Learned Advocate appearing for applicant submits that, during pendency of present application, charge-sheet has been filed, and therefore, he has instructions to withdraw the present application with liberty to file a fresh application before the learned Trial Court. 3. Permission to withdraw is granted with liberty to file a fresh application before the learned Trial Court along with copy of charge-sheet. 4. In case the application is preferred alongwith the charge-sheet then the learned Trial Court decide the same in accordance with law. 5. Bail application is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed. (HITEN S. VENEGAVKAR) JUDGE Tandale 2026:BHC-AUG:42818