Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 10753 (RAJ)

VIRENDRA @ BINDA S/O SHRI TIKAM CHAND v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/10887/2026 · 2026-07-27

Pramil Kumar Mathur

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:28824] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 10887/2026 CNR: RJHC020654402026 | URN: CRLMB / 20142U / 2026 Virendra @ Binda S/o Shri Tikam Chand, Aged About 21 Years, R/o Near Bad Harijan Basti Tulapura P.s. Railway Colony Kota City Rajasthan. (At Present Confined At Central Jail Kota). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Abdul Kalam Khan For Respondent(s) : Mr. Jaiprakash Tiwari, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR Order 27/07/2026 1. The petitioner has preferred this bail application under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.6/2025 registered at Police Station Anantpura, District Kota City for offences under Section 110 of BNS, 2023. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. It is submitted that, although the allegation against the present petitioner is that he attempted to take the life of the injured, namely Ajeet, the injury report clearly reveals that all the injuries sustained by the injured are simple in nature and none has been found on any vital part of the body. Furthermore, the statements of the material prosecution witnesses, PW-1 to PW-6, have already been recorded. The [2026:RJ-JP:28824] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-10887/2026] petitioner has been in judicial custody since 28.03.2025. Though he has eight criminal antecedents, he has already been granted bail in all those cases. Charge-sheet has already been filed. The trial of the case will take considerable time, therefore, no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioner in further custody, consequently, the bail application deserves to be allowed. 4. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application. 5. On consideration of the rival submissions and material available on record and in light of submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner but without expressing any opinion on merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioner. 6. Consequently, the bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is directed that the petitioner Virendra @ Binda S/o Shri Tikam Chand, be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing till conclusion of the trial. (PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J 20/Arun