Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 10751 (AP)

The Chairman and Managing Director v. Sudha Oil and Chemical Industries Ltd

CRP/2074/2026 · 2026-09-17

Ninala Jayasurya

Original Suitbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010278362026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI FRIDAY, THE 18th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 2074 OF 2026 Between: 1. The Chairman and Managing Director, APEPDCL Seethamadhara, Visakhapatnam. ...Petitioner AND 1. Sudha Oil and Chemical Industries Ltd, Represented by its Managing Director, Peddapuram. ...Respondent Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India,praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed herein,the High Court may be pleased toggrieved by the orders dated 10-10-2025 in E.A. No. 51/2019 in E.P. No. 50/2018 in O.S. No. 152/1996 on the file of the Principal Civil Judge (Junior Division), Peddapuram, IA NO: 1 OF 2026 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Please to condone Delay of 119 day in filling the civilRevision petition in E.A No.51 of 2019 in E.P No.50 2018 in o.s No. 2018 in o.s 152 of 1996 Dt.10-10- 2025 on the file of the Principal Junior civil Judge Peddapuram in the interest of justice and pass 2 IA NO: 2 OF 2026 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Pleased to stay all further Proceedings in E.P NO.50 of 2018 in O.S NO. 152 of 1996 on the file of the Principal Civil Judge (Junior Division) at Peddapuram,Pending disposal of the CRP and to Pass Counsel for the Petitioner: V V SATISH (SC for APEPDCL) Counsel for the Respondent The Court made the following order: 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 2074 OF 2026 ORDER: Mr. Y. Nagendra, learned counsel representing learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the matter has become infructuous. 2. Recording the said submission, the civil revision petition is dismissed as infructuous. 3. There shall be no order as to costs. Miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. _____________________ NINALA JAYASURYA, J GVK 4 40 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 2074 OF 2026 Dt. 18.09.2026 GVK