Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 10748 (BOM)

BABANRAO DASHRATH DHAWALE AND ANR. v. BHAGIRATHI SREE SHIKSHAN SANTHA A'BAD AND ORS

CP/147/2008 · 2026-09-22

Contempt Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 903 CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 147 OF 2008 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 903 CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 147 OF 2008 IN WP/3093/2000 BABANRAO DASHRATH DHAWALE AND ANOTHER VERSUS BHAGIRATHI SREE SHIKSHAN SANTHA A'BAD AND ORS ... Adv. M. N. Kalyane h/f Adv. G.B. Rajale, Advocate for the Petitioner Adv. S. J. Salgare, AGP for Respondents-State Adv. Raksha Chaudhari h/f Adv. S. S. Choudhari, Advocate for Respondent No.6. ... CORAM : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE AND VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV, JJ. DATED : 22/09/2026 Order: ( Per Vaishali Patil-Jadhav, J. ) Respondent Nos. 1 and 6 have filed affidavit-in-reply, wherein it is stated that the following five directions are complied with. (i) Approval to their services is given by the Education Officer. (ii) The seniority list is already prepared. It is kept with the Head Master of the School and copy is sent to Education Officer also. (iii) The petitioners have stated in para No.2 of their petition that, the payment of salary is received by them and there is no grievance about it. (iv) The petitioners are being paid their salaries regularly. The benefits attached to their post will be paid at the time of their retirement as per rules. (v) The services of the petitioners are not terminated. 2026:BHC-AUG:43392 2 903 CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 147 OF 2008 2. In view of the statement made in the affidavit-in-reply, the order under contempt is complied with. Moreover, the contempt petition is not circulated after year 2013. 3. In view of the same, the contempt petition is disposed of as the order under contempt is complied with. ( VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV, J. ) ( SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, J. ) shivani/