1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 2172 of 2026 ------ Mojib Ansari @ Mojib, aged about 38 years, son of Kyamuddin Ansari, residents of Village Garh Husir, PO & PS-Kanke, Dist.-Ranchi ……………Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand ..............Opposite Party ------- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUJIT NARAYAN PRASAD ------- For the Petitioner : Mr. Rajesh Kumar, Advocate For the State : Mr. Tarun Kumar, APP Order No.04/ Dated:18th March, 2026 1. The instant bail application under section 483 and 484 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita has been filed seeking grant of regular bail to the petitioner, in connection with Kanke P.S Case No.201 of 2024, registered for the offence under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 190, 126(2), 115(2), 109, 117(2), 352, 74, 61(2) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 pending in the Court of the learned J.M., 1st Class, Ranchi. 2. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in the present case. 3. It has been contended that other similarly situated co-accused person, namely, Murshid Ansari, Wajid Ansari and Ejaj Ansari have been granted bail vide order dated 16.03.2026 passed in B.A No.2042 of 2026 by a co-ordinate Bench of this Court and another co-accused person, namely, Malik Ansari @ Abdul Ansari @ Abdul Malik has been granted bail vide order dated 17.03.2026 passed in B.A. No.2120 of 2026 by a co-ordinate Bench of this Court. 4. It has been submitted that the petitioner is in judicial custody since 03.02.2026. 2 5. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, on the aforesaid grounds, has submitted that the present petitioner may be enlarged on bail on the ground of parity. 6. While on the other hand, Mr. Tarun Kumar, the learned APP appearing for the State, however, has vehemently opposed the prayer for bail. 7. This Court has heard the learned counsel for the parties and gone through the records. 8. This Court, taking into consideration that the petitioner is in judicial custody since 03.02.2026 and other similarly situated co-accused persons, named above, have been granted bail by a co-ordinate Bench of this Court, is of the view that the instant bail application deserves to be allowed. 9. Accordingly, the instant bail application stands allowed. 10. In consequence thereof, the petitioner, named above, is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned J.M., 1st Class, Ranchi in connection with Kanke P.S Case No.201 of 2024, subject to the condition that the petitioner shall co- operate in the trial and shall not absent himself on the date fixed without any cogent cause. In failure, the learned trial court shall have liberty to pass appropriate order in accordance with law so that trial be not hindered. (Sujit Narayan Prasad, J.) Dated:18.03.2026 Sudhir