Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 10744 (CAL)

BHANUTOSH BASAK AND ANR. v. BANK OF BARODA

WPA/4366/2026 · 2026-03-05

Ravi Krishan Kapur

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

31 05.03.2026 Ct. No.07 J.Das IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA CONSTITUTIONAL WRIT JURISDICTION APPELLATE SIDE WPA 4336 of 2026 BHANUTOSH BASAK AND ANR. VS BANK OF BARODA Mr. Sankar Biswas, Mr. Debnath Mahata Mr. Swastik Saha Ms. Ananya Adhikary … For the respondent Bank of Boroda 1. None appears on behalf of the petitioner. Nor is any adjournment prayed for on their behalf even in the second call. 2. The respondent bank is represented. It appears from the submission made on behalf of the respondent bank that despite an original application being filed before the concerned Debt Recovery Tribunal having jurisdiction no effective and real steps have been taken by the respondent bank. 3. In view of the non-appearance of the petitioner, WPA 4366 of 2026 stands dismissed for default. (Ravi Krishan Kapur, J.)