Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 10743 (JHR)

BHARAT FOODS THROUGH ITS PROPRIETOR LAILY BEGAM v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

WPC/755/2021 · 2026-04-28

Sri Ananda Sen

Writ Petition (Civil)body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:JHHC:12351 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(C) No. 755 of 2021 ----- Bharat Foods, through its Proprietor Laily Begam, W/o Sheikh Abdullah Hashim, M/s Bharat Traders (Bharat Foods), Opposite- Punjab Sweet House, Main Road, P.O. G.P.O., P.S. Lower Bazar, District Ranchi and R/o Dipatoli, Konka, P.O. G.P.O., P.S. Lower Bazar, District Ranchi .... Petitioner(s). Versus 1.The State of Jharkhand 2.Deputy Commissioner, Collectorate Building, Near Kutchery, Kutchery Road, P.O. G.P.O., P.S. Kotwali, District Ranchi. 3. Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Collectorate Building, Near Kutchery, Kutchery Road, P.O. G.P.O., P.S. Kotwali, District Ranchi 4. Municipal Commissioner, Ranchi Municipal Corporation, Corporation Kutchery, Kutchery Road, P.O. G.P.O., P.S. Kotwali, District Ranchi 5. Additional Municipal Commissioner, Ranchi, Building Corporation Near Kutchery, Kutchery Road, P.O. G.P.O. P.S. Kotwali, District Ranchi 6. Officer Incharge, Lower Bazar Police Station, P.O. G.P.O., P.S. Lower Bazar, District Ranchi 7. General Secretary, Gossner Evangelical Lutheran (GEL) Church, Central Council, GEL Church Compound, P.Ο. GPO-1, P.S. Lower Bazar, Town and District Ranchi Jharkhand 8. Sidhant Construction, C/o. Shri Rakesh Tiwari (Contractor Mr. Sudesh Rakesh Tirkey), Local Office at G.E.L. Church Complex, Phase No. 2, Behind G.E.L. Church Market Complex, P.O. G.P.O., P.S. Lower Bazar, District Ranchi, Jharkhand … Respondent(s) ------ CORAM : SRI ANANDA SEN, J. ------ For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. Shresth Gautam, Advocate For the Respondent(s) : Mr. Saurav Arun, Advocate Ms. Ayushi, Advocate Mr. Rohit Ranjan Singh, Advocate For the Resp. Nos.4&5 : Dr. Mithilesh Kr. Pandey, Advocate For the Resp. Nos.7 & 8 : Mr. J.J. Sanga, Advocate Mr. Randhir Kr. Sharma, Advocate Ms. Angel Khalkho, Advocate …...... 15/ 28.04.2026 After some argument, learned counsel for the petitioners seek permission to withdraw this writ petition. 2. Permission is accorded. 3. Accordingly, this writ petition dismissed as withdrawn. 4. Pending, I.A., if any, stands disposed of. 5. The copy of plaints of Original (Title) Suit No.2394 of 2019 and Original Suit No.61 of 2026 be kept on record. (ANANDA SEN, J.) 28th April, 2026 R.S./S.K.C. Uploaded on 30/04//2026