Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 10739 (GAU)

Nawab Enterprise v. State of Assam

2026-05-22

Devashis Baruah

body2026
JUDGMENT & ORDER : DEVASHIS BARUAH, J. Heard Ms. P. Borah, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners and Ms. D. Bora, learned Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of the Health and Family Welfare Department, Assam. 2. The instant writ petition has been filed by the Petitioners challenging the non-payment of an amount of Rs. 43,33,195.92 against the execution of works allotted to the petitioners vide letter No. NHM/DHS/MRG/Covid’19/2021-22/574 dated 20.05.2021 issued by the Joint Director of Health Services, Morigaon, Assam. 3. The case of the petitioners is that the petitioner No. 2 herein is a registered contractor under the Department of Public Health, Government of Assam and the proprietor of Petitioner No. 1. During period of Covid-19 pandemic, the respondent authorities had allotted several works to the petitioners related to Bowalguri ITI COVID Care Centre at Morigaon district and issued work order vide letter dated 20.05.2021. As per the said work order, the petitioners had completed the works allotted to them and also submitted the bills of the works, so completed by them. However, out of the total bill amount of Rs. 56,07,016.92/-, the respondent authorities had paid only Rs.12,73,821/- to the petitioners and the payment of remaining amount i.e. Rs. 43,33,195.92/- has not yet been made to the petitioners; even though, the bills had already been submitted by the petitioners to the respondent authorities. Being aggrieved, the petitioners have approached this Court by filing the present petition. 4. Ms. D. Bora, learned Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of the Health and Family Welfare Department, Assam submitted that there is no denial to the fact that the work in question was issued to the Petitioners. The learned Standing Counsel, however, submitted that the entitlement of the Petitioners would depend upon verification to be carried out by the Respondent Authorities. 5. Upon perusal of the materials on record, this Court is of the opinion that if the Petitioners had completed the abovementioned work, the Petitioners would be entitled to the amount. However, for the same, verification on the part of the Respondent Authorities would be required. 6. This Court therefore disposes of the instant writ petition with the following observations and directions:- (i) The Respondent Authorities shall verify as to whether the Petitioners had successfully executed the work, i.e. Supply diet & other requirement at Bowalguri ITI Covid Care Centre. However, for the same, verification on the part of the Respondent Authorities would be required. 6. This Court therefore disposes of the instant writ petition with the following observations and directions:- (i) The Respondent Authorities shall verify as to whether the Petitioners had successfully executed the work, i.e. Supply diet & other requirement at Bowalguri ITI Covid Care Centre. (ii) The Respondent Authorities shall also verify as to whether, the Petitioners had submitted the requisite documents which are required for the purpose of releasing the amount due, as claimed by the Petitioners. (iii) The Respondent Authorities shall also verify the entitlement of the Petitioners to the dues, and if upon verification in the manner stated above, it is found that the Petitioners are entitled to any such amount, the Respondent Authorities shall pay the same to the petitioners. (iv) The above exercise be completed within a period of 6 (six) months from the date a certified copy of the instant order is served upon the respondent authorities.