Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 10738 (PAT)

Rajeev yadav @ Rajeev Kumar Yadav v. The State of Bihar

CR. MISC./25439/2026 · 2026-05-06

Sandeep Kumar

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.25439 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-37 Year-2024 Thana- LARJHAGHAT District- Samastipur ====================================================== 1. Rajeev yadav @ Rajeev Kumar Yadav Son of Vishnudeo Yadav Resident of Fuhiya PS -Larjhaghat District -Samastipur 2. Chandan Yadav @ Chandan Kumar son of Ram Bilash Yadav Resident of Fuhiya PS -Larjhaghat District -Samastipur 3. Raj Babbar Yadav @ Raj Babbar Kumar Son of Chhabbu Yadav Resident of Village- Karanchi, Ps- Bithan, Dist- Samastipur ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ranjit Kumar Yadav For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Lalan Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 2 06-05-2026 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State. 2. The petitioners apprehend arrest in connection with Larjhaghat P.S. Case No. 37 of 2024 registered for offences under Sections 80(2), 238 and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. 3. As per the prosecution case, the accused persons are said to have killed the deceased for demand of dowry. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are quite innocent and have not committed any offence. It is further submitted that after investigation, the police submitted a final form exonerating the petitioners, and thereafter, the learned Magistrate differed with the final form and has taken cognizance. Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.25439 of 2026(2) dt.06-05-2026 2/2 5. Learned APP for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for bail. 6. Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case, the nature of allegations and the submissions made on behalf of the parties, this application for anticipatory bail is allowed. 7. Accordingly, let the petitioners, above-named, in the event of their arrest or surrender within four weeks from today in the Court below, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Court below where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Larjhaghat P.S. Case No. 37 of 2024. 8. It is made clear that any observation made herein is prima facie in nature and limited solely for the purpose of adjudication of the present bail application. Such observations shall not be construed as an expression on the merits of the case and shall not influence the trial or any other proceedings in any manner. Shishir/- (Sandeep Kumar, J) U T