Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 10738 (MAD)

Periyanayagi v. The State represented by The Inspector of Police

CRL OP/11170/2026 · 2026-05-07

L Victoria Gowri

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CRL OP No. 11170 of 2026 __________ Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 07-05-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MRS.JUSTICE L.VICTORIA GOWRI CRL OP No. 11170 of 2026 Periyanayagi ..Petitioner Vs The State represented by The Inspector of Police Arakandanallur Police Station, Villupuram District. Crime No.74 of 2026 ..Respondent PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, to enlarge the petitioner on bail in Crime No.74 of 2026 pending on the file of the respondent police For Petitioner: Mr.R.Thamarai Selvan For Respondent: Mr.V.J.Priyadarsana Government Advocate (Crl.Side) ORDER Petition seeking bail in connection with Crime No.74 of 2026 registered for the offences punishable under Section 194 of BNSS, 2023, @ 103(1), 238, 49, 61(2) of BNS, 2023, is on board for consideration. 2. The case of the prosecution is that the deceased, a film director, was previously in a relationship with the first accused (A1), Pooja. Following a https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 11170 of 2026 __________ Page2 of 4 misunderstanding, A1 ended the relationship and became involved with the second accused (A2). However, the deceased allegedly persisted in his demands for marriage and issued threats to A1. Consequently, A1 is alleged to have entered into a criminal conspiracy with A2 and other accused persons to commit the murder of the deceased. Hence the case. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is an innocent person and has been falsely implicated in this case. He also submitted that the petitioner is suffering incarceration from 09.03.2026 and she is ready to abide by any stringent condition that may be imposed by this Court. Hence, he prayed for the grant of bail to the petitioner. 4. Learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) appearing for the respondent reiterated the prosecution case and opposed for the grant of bail. He further submitted that the investigation is still pending. 5. Heard both sides and perused the materials available on record. 6. Taking note of the facts and circumstances of the case, nature of allegations, submissions made by the learned counsel on either side and considering the antecedents of the petitioner, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 11170 of 2026 __________ Page3 of 4 7. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition stands dismissed. 07-05-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No rpl To 1.The Inspector of Police Arakandanallur Police Station, Villupuram District. 2.The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras, Chennai. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 11170 of 2026 __________ Page4 of 4 L.VICTORIA GOWRI J. rpl/lpp CRL OP No. 11170 of 2026 07-05-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis