[2026:JHHC:1797] -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 6548 of 2025 1. Karu Ganjhu, aged about 38 years, son of Amrit Ganjhu, 2. Pradeep Kumar Ganjhu aged about 29 years, son of Fuleshwar Ganjhu, Both resident of Village- Chetar, PO.- Aan, P S.- Chandwa, District-Latehar. ..... … Petitioners Versus The State of Jharkhand ..... … Opposite Party -------- CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI ------ For the Petitioners : Mr. Jitendra S. Singh, Advocate. For the State : Mr. Achinto Sen, A.P.P. ------ 03/ 22.01.2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P for the State. 2. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with Chandwa P.S. Case No. 41 of 2025, registered for the offence under Sections 111(3), 111(4), 308(4), 308(6), 310(4), 310(5), 61 and 62 of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, pending in the court of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Latehar. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that although the petitioners are named in the FIR, however, the petitioners have not been indulged in snatching of the mobile and in demand of extortion and false allegations are made against these petitioners. He next submits that it has been alleged that they are the members of Rahul Singh Gang. He then submits that the petitioners are having no criminal antecedent and disclosure to that effect has been made in para- 10 of the petition. 4. Learned A.P.P. appearing for the State has opposed the [2026:JHHC:1797] -2- prayer and submits that the allegations are made that the petitioners are the members of Rahul Singh Gang and they have demanded extortion. 5. Looking into the contents of the FIR, it appears that these petitioners are named in the FIR and they are said to be the members of Rahul Singh Gang and the allegation of demand of extortion is also there, I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners. Accordingly, their prayer for anticipatory bail is rejected. (Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) Dated:-22.01.2026 Amitesh/-