Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 10734 (KAR)

MRS. SUSHRITA KAR v. THE ASSISTANT REVENUE OFFICER

WP/9279/2024 · 2026-03-23

M I Arun

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:16276 WP No. 9279 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 23RD DAY OF MARCH, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.I.ARUN WRIT PETITION NO.9279 OF 2024 (LB-BMP) BETWEEN: 1. MRS. SUSHRITA KAR AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS, W/O. MR. RAKESH JOHN KURIAN, 2. MR. RAKESH JOHN KURIAN AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS, S/O SRI POOCHAKERIL JOHN KURIAN, BOTH ARE RESIDING AT FLAT NO.3G, ANGEL ARCADE, 10TH CROSS, KAGAGDASAPURA, C.V. RAMAN NAGAR, BENGALURU - 560 093. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. VIJAYA KUMAR V., ADVOCATE (through VC)) AND: 1. THE ASSISTANT REVENUE OFFICER C.V. RAMAN NAGAR SUB-DIVISION, BRUHATH BENGALURU MAHANAGARA PALIKE, MADAVA MODALIYAR ROAD, OPP. PALIKE MATERNITY HOSPITAL, COX TOWN, BENGALURU - 560 005. Digitally signed by GEETHA P G Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:16276 WP No. 9279 of 2024 2. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF COMMERCIAL TAXES (AUDIT - 5.4,) DIVISIONAL GOODS AND SERVICE TAX-5, 4TH FLOOR, KORAMANGALA, BENGALURU - 560 047. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. PAWAN KUMAR, ADVOCATE FOR R.1; SRI. BOPANNA BELLIAPPA, AGA., FOR R.2.) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO DIRECT THE RESPONDENT NO.2 TO EFFECT TRANSFER OF KHATHA OF THE SCHEDULE PROPERTY FROM THE NAME OF ITS PREVIOUS OWNER SRI. S. BALAJI MANIMARAN TO THE NAMES OF THE PETITIONERS WITHOUT INSISTING THE PETITIONERS TO OBTAIN NO OBJECTION FROM THE RESPONDENT NO.2 OR ANY OTHER AUTORITIES CONNECTED WITH THE RESPONDENT NO.2 ETC. THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THROUGH PHYSICAL HEARING/VIDEO CONFERENCING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.I.ARUN - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:16276 WP No. 9279 of 2024 ORAL ORDER 1. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the writ petition may be dismissed as withdrawn. 2. His submission is placed on record. 3. The writ petition is accordingly dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- (M.I.ARUN) JUDGE hkh. List No.: 1 Sl No.: 73