Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 10734 (ALL)

X JUVENILE v. STATE OF U.P.

NABAIL/10363/2026 · 2026-09-30

Rajiv Lochan Shukla

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No. - 10363 of 2026 Court No. - 71 HON'BLE RAJIV LOCHAN SHUKLA, J. 1. After some arguments, the Learned counsel for the applicant prays that he may be permitted to withdraw this application with liberty to move a regular bail application before the concerned Court and till such time, his interest may be protected. 2. The Learned A.G.A. has no objection to the said prayer. 3. Taking into account the submissions made by the Learned counsels for the parties, it is provided that in case the applicant appears before the concerned Court within a period of four weeks from today and applies for regular bail in Case Crime No.138 of 2026, under Sections 109(1), 76, 131, 117(2), 351(2), 351(3) B.N.S. 2023, P.S.- Kharkhauda, District- Meerut, his application for bail may be considered expeditiously, in accordance with the law, without being influenced by any observations made by the concerned Court, while rejecting the anticipatory bail application of the applicant. 4. For a period of four weeks from today, no coercive action shall be taken against the applicant in the above-mentioned case. 5. The application stands disposed of. October 1, 2026/Sachin Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Indra Deo Mishra, Praveen Kumar Shukla, Premshankar Shukla Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : Ashish Singh, G.A. (Rajiv Lochan Shukla,J.) X Juvenile .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- SACHIN TIWARI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad