MANJUSHA CHANDRAKANT SUDAME v. BHAGIRATHI STREE SHIKSHAN SANSTHA AURANGABAD AND ORS
CP/162/2009 · 2026-09-22
Contempt Petitionbody2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 10732 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 10732 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1 903 CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 162 OF 2009 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 903 CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 162 OF 2009 IN WP/3093/2000 MANJUSHA CHANDRAKANT SUDAME VERSUS BHAGIRATHI STREE SHIKSHAN SANSTHA AURANGABAD AND ORS … Adv. M. N. Kalyane h/f Adv. G.B. Rajale, Advocate for the Petitioner Adv. S. J. Salgare, AGP for Respondents-State Adv. Raksha Chaudhari h/f Adv. S. S. Choudhari, Advocate for Respondent No.6. ...
CORAM : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE AND VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV, JJ.
DATED : 22/09/2026
Order: ( Per Vaishali Patil-Jadhav, J. ) . The learned counsel holding for Mr. Rajale has placed on record letter dated 22.08.2026 addressed to the advocate by the petitioner stating that the contempt petition may be withdrawn as he has retired from the service and he has no grievance against the institution. The said letter is taken on record and marked “X” for identification.
2. In view of the same, the Contempt Petition is disposed as withdrawn.
( VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV, J. ) ( SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, J. ) shivani/ 2026:BHC-AUG:43391