Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 1072 (PAT)

Pintu Kumar v. The State of Bihar

CR. MISC./20778/2026 · 2026-04-02

Ashok Kumar Pandey

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.20778 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-488 Year-2025 Thana- MIRGANJ District- Gopalganj ====================================================== Pintu Kumar S/o Krishna Prasad R/o - Tamkuhi Road, P.S - Tamkuhi, District - Kushinagar, State - Uttar Pradesh At present R/o - Mirganj Ward No. 6, Bluaapar, P.S - Mirganj, District - Gopalganj, Bihar ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sumit Shekhar Pandey, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Md. Matloob Rab, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 2 02-04-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State. 2. The petitioner has prayed for regular bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under section 303(2) of BNS. 3. The case of the prosecution is that some unknown miscreants have stolen two x-ray machines from indo therm test house. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the FIR was lodged against unknown miscreants. During course of investigation, one Prince Kumar was apprehended and he has given his confessionals statement and the name of this petitioner has Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.20778 of 2026(2) dt.02-04-2026 2/2 surfaced in the confessional statement of that co-accused Prince. From perusal of order of the learned trial court, it will transpire that the recovery of the x-ray machines was made from the possession of Dinesh Sharma and Vinesh Sharma. Learned counsel has submitted that save and except confessional statement, there is nothing against the petitioner. A statement has been made in para-3 of this petition that the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent. Moreover, he is languishing in judicial custody since 10.10.2025. 5. Learned APP appearing for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer of regular bail. 6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the afacts and circumstances of the case, this court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be released on bail in connection with Mirganj P.S. Case No. 488 of 2025 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned J.M. 2nd Class, Gopalganj, Bihar. shubham/- (Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) U T