HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 16105 of 2026 Court No. - 52 HON'BLE MRS. MANJU RANI CHAUHAN, J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for the State- respondents and Mr. Rama Nand Pandey, learned counsel for the respondent-BSA. This writ petition has been filed with a prayer to quash the order dated 08.09.2026 passed by respondent no. 6, whereby the petitioner's claim for pension has been rejected. At the very outset, learned counsel for the respondent-B.S.A., Mr. Ramanand Pandey, submits that the District Basic Education Officer has no power now to decide the issue, as the jurisdiction lies with respondent no. 4 - Additional Director, Treasury and Pension, Bareilly Division, Bareilly. In view of the above, no interference is required. However, in case the petitioner moves a fresh representation before respondent no. 4 - Additional Director, Treasury and Pension, Bareilly Division, Bareilly ventilating all his grievances, an appropriate order may be passed in accordance with law, after affording opportunity of hearing to the petitioner, within a period of two months thereafter. With the aforesaid observation, the writ petition stands disposed of. October 1, 2026 Jitendra/- Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Rajneesh Kumar Srivastava, Smt. Priyanka Srivastava Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Rama Nand Pandey (Mrs. Manju Rani Chauhan,J.) Smt Rana Begam .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 6 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- JITENDRA KUMAR YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad