Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Himachal Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 10712 (HP)

PUSHPA DEVI v. SONIYA GOPE NARAYANI

CMP/10291/2026 · 2026-05-25

Sushil Kukreja

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Pushpa Devi Vs. Soniya Gope Narayani & Ors. CMP No. 10291/2026 in FAO No. 105/2016 25.05.2026 Present: Ms. Neelam Kaplas, Advocate, vice Mr. J.R. Poswal, Advocate, for the applicant/appellant. Mr. Amit Himalvi, Advocate, vice Ms. Kamakshi Tarlokta, Advocate, for non- applicant/respondent No. 3. The present application under Section 151 of CPC has been filed on behalf of the applicant/appellant, for release of the enhanced amount of compensation, alongwith up-to-date interest, lying deposited in the Registry of this Court. The application is duly supported by an affidavit of the applicant. No reply to the application is intended to be filed and learned vice counsel for the non- applicant/Insurance Company, under instructions received from the original counsel, states that he has no objection in case the prayer made in the application is allowed, as no appeal has been preferred against the judgment passed by this Court and the same has attained finality. Heard. Having regard to the averments made in the application, which is duly supported by an affidavit of the applicant, coupled with the fact that till date, no appeal has been preferred against the judgment passed by this Court and the same has attained finality, the same is allowed and the enhanced amount of compensation lying deposited in the Registry of this Court, alongwith up-to-date interest, is ordered to be released in favour of the applicant/appellant, as per her share, after proper verification and identification, by remitting the same to her bank account, details whereof have been mentioned in para-3 of the application. The application stands disposed of. ( Sushil Kukreja ) Judge 25th May, 2026 (raman)