Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 10711 (AP)

M/s. Sri Sal Teja Engineers Private Limited, v. Sri G Sai Prasad, I.A.S,

CC/2063/2026 · 2026-09-10

V Sujatha

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010179602026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3333] FRIDAY, THE 11th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA CONTEMPT CASE NO: 2063/2026 Between: 1. M/S. SRI SAL TEJA ENGINEERS PRIVATE LIMITED,, REP. BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR, P. UMA LAKSHMANA KUMAR, S/O. SEETHARAMUDU, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, OCC CONTRACTOR, RIO. D.NO.5-9711, RAJU VARRI PALEM, KOMARAGIRIPATNAM, ALLAVARAM, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT ...PETITIONER AND 1. SRI G SAI PRASAD I A S, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT IRRIGATION AND CAD WATER RESOURCES DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, A P SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. SRI PEEYUSH KUMAR I A S, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY FINANCE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 3. SRI MAHESH KUMAR RAVIRALA I A S, DISTRICT COLLECTOR, DR. B. R AMBEDKAR KONASEEMA DISTRICT AT AMALAPURAM. 4. SRI G SRINIVASA RAO, THE SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER, IRRIGATION AND WATER RESOURCES DEPARTMENT, IRRIGATION CIRCLE, DOWLESWARAM, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT 5. SRI KASI VENKATESWARA RAO, THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, WATER RESOURCES DEPARTMENT, GODAVARI CENTRAL DIVISION, AMALAPURAM, DR B R AMBEDKAR KONASEEMA 2 DISTRICT ...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to pleased to punish the respondents U/s. 10 to 12 of contempts of Court Acts for willful and deliberate violation of Final order passed in WP No 30977/2025 dated 02.12.2025 by Learned Single Judge Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. ANNAMNEEDI BALAKRISHNA Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. RAMA RAO KOCHIRI 2. SOMA RAJU YELISETTI The Court made the following: 3 ORDER: This contempt case is filed against the respondents for willful disobedience of the orders passed by this Court in W.P.No.30977 of 2025, dated 02.12.2025. The operative portion of the said order is extracted hereunder: “…..this Writ Petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to release the amount to the petitioner in accordance with quality control certificate dated 12.06.2025, 12.08.2025, 20.05.2025, 12.05.2025, 20.05.2025, 20.05.2025, 12.05.2025, 15.01.2025, 15.03.2025, 26.09.2025, 07.10.2025, 07.10.2025, 26.09.2025, 26.09.2025 and 26.09.2025 issued by the respondents, within a period of six (06) months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order….” 2. Today when the matter came up for hearing, learned counsel appearing for the respondents/contemnors furnished a copy of Letter No.FIN01- FMU0MISC/350/2022(1778130), dated 11.09.2026, issued by the 2nd respondent, wherein it is stated that the Finance Department has received the following bills in respect of the present contempt case and the same have been cleared. The details are as follows: Bill No. Net amount (Rs.) Payment Status 2026-71434690 4,11,471/- Cleared on 11.09.2026 2026-71432874 4,00,747/- Cleared on 11.09.2026 2026-71433870 2,79,423/- Cleared on 11.09.2026 2026-71448303 4,82,855/- Cleared on 11.09.2026 2026-71452206 4,83,109/- Cleared on 11.09.2026 4 2026-71458781 4,01,010/- Cleared on 11.09.2026 2026-71453790 3,62,819/- Cleared on 11.09.2026 2026-71452549 81,846/- Cleared on 11.09.2026 2026-71432104 3,69,342/- Cleared on 11.09.2026 2026-71453239 1,64,816/- Cleared on 11.09.2026 2026-71450367 3,35,503/- Cleared on 11.09.2026 2026-71449855 3,63,691/- Cleared on 11.09.2026 2026-71448956 3,60,080/- Cleared on 11.09.2026 2026-71450686 3,65,243/- Cleared on 11.09.2026 2026-71432553 2,24,184/- Cleared on 11.09.2026 3. Therefore, learned counsel for the respondents/contemnors requested this Court to close the contempt case. 4. Recording the above submissions and, in view of the fact that the amounts have been cleared by the respondents in favour of the petitioner, the Contempt Case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, in this case shall stand closed. ___________________ JUSTICE V.SUJATHA Date: 11.09.2026 KGR