[2026:RJ-JP:11253] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous 2nd Bail Application No. 4076/2026 Sahil S/o Shri Rashid, Aged About 19 Years, Residence Of Village Kawaan Ka Vas, Police Station Khoh, District Deeg Rajasthan. (At Present Accused Is Confined In District Jail Deeg) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor. ----Respondent Connected With S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous 2nd Bail Application No. 4077/2026 Tarif S/o Sh. Sufeda, Aged About 25 Years, R/o Gram Hingota Police Station Khoh District Deeg Raj. (At Present Accused Is Confined In District Jail Deeg) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Arafat Hussain For Respondent(s) : Ms. Aarti Sharma, P.P. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA Order 17/03/2026 1. These second bail applications have been filed by the accused-petitioners under Section 483 BNSS in connection with FIR No. 0001/2026 registered at Police Station Khoh, District Deeg for offences under Sections 319(2), 318(4), 308(2), 317(2), 317(4), 317(5), 338, 336(3), 340(2), 61(2)(a), 313, 303(2) of BNS 2023 and 66D of IT Act, 2008. [2026:RJ-JP:11253] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-4076/2026] 2. Learned counsel for the accused-petitioners submits that the accused-petitioners have falsely been implicated in the case and they are in custody since 01.01.2026. Counsel further submit that Police after completion of investigation, has submitted charge-sheet in the matter. Counsel also submit that trial of the case is likely to take considerable time to conclude, therefore, the accused-petitioners may be enlarged on bail. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor appearing for the State opposed the bail application. 4. Considered the submissions made by the counsel for the accused-petitioners as well as learned Public Prosecutor. 5. Having regard to the submissions made on behalf of the accused-petitioners so also the fact that Police after completion of investigation has submitted charge-sheet in the matter and they are in custody since 01.01.2026, this Court without expressing any opinion on merits and demerits of the case, deems just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioners on bail. 6. Accordingly, these second bail applications are allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioners shall be released on bail provided that they furnish a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lac Only) (each), together with two sureties in the sum of Rs. 50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand Only) (each) to the satisfaction of the Trial Court with the stipulation that they shall appear before that Court or any Court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. [2026:RJ-JP:11253] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-4076/2026] 7. However, it is made clear that in case the accused- petitioners are found to be involved in any other criminal case of similar nature in future, the prosecution may move an application for cancellation of this bail. (GANESH RAM MEENA),J SHRUTI SHARMA /22,24