[2026:JHHC:3262] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr.M.P. No.3325 of 2025 ------ 1. Jagdish Yadav, aged about 59 years, son of Bandhan Yadav 2. Sarita Devi, aged about 29 years, wife of Vijay Kumar Yadav 3. Punam Devi @ Poonam Kumari, aged about 26 years, wife of Umesh Kumar Yadav 4. Vijay Kumar Yadav, aged about 32 years, son of Jagdish Yadav 5. Umesh Yadav, aged about 30 years, son of Jagdish Yadav All resident of village Birsodih, P.O. & P.S. – Jainagar, District- Koderma, Jharkhand … Petitioners Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. Kartik Yadav, aged about 51 years, S/o Late Jhaman Yadav resident of village Birsodih, P.O. & P.S. – Jainagar, District – Koderma, Jharkhand … Opposite Parties ------ CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioners : Mr. Avilash Kumar, Advocate For the State : Ms. Kumari Rashmi, Addl. P.P. For the O.P. No.2 : Mr. Nitesh Kumar, Advocate ------ Order No:-03 Dated:-06-02-2026 Heard the parties. This criminal miscellaneous petition has been filed by the petitioners with the prayer for restoration of Cr.M.P. No.3244 of 2022 to its original file which stood dismissed for non-compliance of the peremptory order dated 04.09.2025 passed by this Court. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that Cr.M.P. No.3244 of 2022 stood dismissed for non-compliance of the peremptory order dated 04.09.2025 passed by this Court to file a consolidated Cr.M.P. within two weeks from the date of the said order. It is next submitted that after passing of the said order, the order could not be communicated to the petitioner as the counsel was not having the contact number of the petitioner and due to same, the said Cr.M.P. No.3244 of 2022 stood dismissed for non-compliance of the said peremptory order dated 04.09.2025 passed by this Court. It is next submitted that non-compliance of the said peremptory order dated 04.09.2025 was neither deliberate nor intentional. It is also submitted that the petitioners have very good grounds to agitate in the said Cr.M.P. No.3244 of 2022 and unless the same is restored to its original file, the petitioners will be highly prejudiced. Hence, it is submitted that the Cr.M.P. No.3244 of 2022 be restored to its original file. Learned Addl. P. P. appearing for the State and the learned counsel for the opposite party No.2 have not raised any serious objection. Considering the aforesaid submission of the learned counsel for the petitioners, Cr.M.P. No.3244 of 2022 is directed to be restored to its original file at the same stage at which it was before its dismissal. Registry is directed to list Cr.M.P. No.3244 of 2022 before the concerned Bench after a week. This criminal miscellaneous petition is disposed of accordingly. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Dated- 06.02.2026-Animesh/