Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2026 DAILYLAW 10705 (PNJ)

RAMPHAL (NOW DECEASED) THROUGH HIS LRS AND OTHERS v. HARYANA STATE THR ITS COLLECTOR AND OTHERS

RFA/1071/2023 · 2026-04-08

Harkesh Manuja

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

151-2 IN TH Ramphal (n Haryana Sta and others CORAM: Present: HARKESH HSIIDC sub judgment appeals, le “Haryana Haryana Corporatio others”, respondent by the lando IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJA AT CHANDIGAR RFA Date hal (now deceased) through LRs and Versus na State through its Collector, Distric thers HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HAR Mr. Gaurav Aggarwal, Advocat for the appellants-landowners. Mr. Abhinash Jain, Deputy Adv for respondent Nos. 1 & 2. Mr. Pritam Singh Saini, Advoca Ms. Surbhi Rana, Advocate for respondent No. 3-HSIIDC. **** KESH MANUJA, J. (ORAL) At the outset, learned couns submits that the present appeal i ent dated 19.02.2026 passed by ls, lead case of which was RFA na State Industrial Developm a State Industrial and Infra ation Limited), Panchkula Ve whereby the appeals prefer ndent-HSIIDC were dismissed, while landowners. UNJAB AND HARYANA IGARH RFA No. 1071 of 2023 (O&M) Date of Decision: 08.04.2026 s and others ...Appellants istrict Gurugram ...Respondents HARKESH MANUJA vocate ners. ty Advocate General, Haryana dvocate with IIDC. counsel for respondent No. 3- peal is squarely covered by the by this Court in a bunch of RFA No. 530 of 2017, titled lopment Corporation (now Infrastructure Development Versus Gian Chand and preferred at the instance of while allowing the appeals filed DINESH KUMAR 2026.04.16 14:50 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document          -2-     [2] On the other hand, learned counsel for the appellants- landowners is not in a position to controvert the above factual position. [3] After going through the judgment passed in Gian Chand’s case (supra) as well as the facts of the present case, this Court agrees with the assertion of the learned counsel for respondent No. 3-HSIIIDC. [4] Consequently, the present appeal is disposed of in the same terms as Gian Chand’s case (supra). [5] Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, shall stand(s) disposed of.  April 08, 2026 ( HARKESH MANUJA ) ‘dk kamra’ JUDGE            DINESH KUMAR 2026.04.16 14:50 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document