Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 1070 (AP)

K LALITHA v. State of Andhra Pradesh,

WP/2755/2026 · 2026-04-14

Y Lakshmana Rao

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010019442026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3521] WEDNESDAY,THE FIFTEENTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 2755/2026 Between: 1. K LALITHA, W/O RAVI KUMAR, AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS, RIO. KONDAYYA COLONY, 1ST LINE, AMARAVATHI ROAD, GUNTUR CITY ...PETITIONER AND 1. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY,HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI.522238 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, GUNTUR DISTRICT 522004 3. THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, GUNTUR SUB- DIVISION, GUNTUR DISTRICT.522001 4. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, ARUNDALPET POLICE STATION, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 522002 5. DASARI SAMBASIVA RAO, S/O. MASTAN RAO, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, R/O 2ND LINE,KONDAIAH COLONY ,GUNTUR CITY, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 522002 6. MASTAN RAO, S/O. NOT KNOW THE PETITIONER, AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS,R/O. 2ND LINE,KONDAIAH COLONY ,GUNTUR CITY, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 522002 7. RAMU, S/O.MASTAN RAO, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, R/O. 2ND LINE,KONDAIAH COLONY ,GUNTUR CITY, GUNTUR DISTRICT.522002 ...RESPONDENT(S): 2 Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. RAVI TEJA GUDE Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: ORDER: Sri Ravi Teja Gude, learned Counsel for the Petitioner submits that pursuant to the directions given by this Court for registration of FIR, a case in Cr.No.261/2026 was registered on Arundalpet Police Station and therefore, the Writ Petition may be disposed of. In that view of the matter, the Writ Petition is disposed of, directing the Station House Officer, Arundalpet police Station to take the FIR to a logical end in accordance with law by filing appropriate proceedings before the learned Jurisdictional Magistrate concerned. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, interlocutory applications, if any pending, shall stand closed. _________________________ Dr. Y. LAKSHMANA RAO, J Dated: 15.04.2026 VTS