Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 107 (UTT)

KALPANA LOHUMI v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

CRLR/533/2024 · 2026-02-10

Rakesh Thapliyal

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:UHC:750 SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS I.A. No. 5 of 2026 In CRLR/533/2024 Hon’ble Rakesh Thapliyal, J. 1. Mr. B. S. Bhandari, learned counsel for the revisionist. 2. Mr. Sandeep Sharma, learned AGA for the State. 3. Mr. Mukul Dangi, learned counsel for the respondent no. 2. 4. This withdrawal application has been moved by the revisionist for withdrawal of the revision on the ground that parties have settled their dispute by seeking divorce by way of mutual consent. 5. Leaned counsel for the respondents have no objection to this. 6. In such view of the matter, withdrawal application is allowed. The instant criminal revision is dismissed as withdrawn. 7. Interim order, if any, stands vacated. (Rakesh Thapliyal, J.) 10.02.2026 SKS