Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C) No.9781 of 2026
Sipra Rout
….
Petitioner Mr. M. Padhi, Advocate
-versus-
State of Odisha and Others
….
Opp. Parties Mr. A. Tripathy, AGA
CORAM:
JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY
Order No
ORDER 07.04.2026
01. 1. This matter is taken up through Hybrid Arrangement (Virtual/Physical) Mode.
2. Heard learned counsel for the parties.
3. The Petitioner has filed the present Writ Petition
inter alia with the following prayer: -
“It is, therefore, prayed that this Hon'ble Court may graciously be pleased to issue notice to the opp. Parties calling upon them to file show cause as to why a direction shall not be issued to issue
order of runder R appointment in favour of the petitioner anisst any as per her qualification available under the Opp. Party no. 4 and after hearing the parties be pleased to direct the Opp. Parties issue order of appointment in favour of the petitioner under R.A. Rules to save the family from distress and to maintain livelihood. And pass any other order(s), direction (s) as this Hon’ble Court may deems fit and proper.” p. 2p. 2
4.
Learned counsel for the Petitioner submits that through highlighting her grievances, the petitioner has filed a representation vide Annexure-6 to the Writ Petition, but till date nothing has been done in the matter. In such background, she prays that a direction be issued to the Opposite Party No.4 to take a decision on the above noted petition within a specific time period.
5. Considering the submissions made and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, this Court directs the Opposite Party No.4 to take a decision on the above noted representation in accordance with law, within a period of two months from the date of production of certified copy of this
order and communicate the result of such exercise to the petitioner.
6. The Writ Petition is disposed of accordingly.
(Biraja Prasanna Satapathy)
Judge Basudev