Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2026:JHHC:643 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
W.P.(C) No.3043 of 2024
1. Prabha Devi, aged about 61 years, wife of Bhola Mahto, Resident of village – Barwadih, P.O. and P.S. - Haidar Nagar, District – Palamau
2. Sushila Devi, aged about 60 years, wife of Jokhan Singh, Resident of village-Budhai Bigha, P.O. and P.S. Haidar Nagar, District- Palamau.
3. Lakshami Narayan Singh, aged about 88 years, Son of Indra Singh, Resident of village- Nawdiha, P.O. Bilaspur, P.S.-Haidar Nagar, District- Palamau. …… Petitioners Versus
1. The State of Jharkhand
2. The Secretary, Department of Revenue,
Registration and Land Reforms, Office at Project Building, P.O. & P.S. Dhurwa, Dist. Ranchi.
3. The Deputy Commissioner, Palamau, P.O. & P.S. Palamau, Dist. Palamau.
4. The District Land Settlement Officer, Palamau, P.O. & P.S. Palamau, Dist.-Palamau.
5. The Circle Officer, Haider Nagar, Haider Nagar, PO and PS -Palamau, Dist.-Palamau. …... Respondents ---------
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR --------- For the Petitioners : Mr. Binod Kumar, Advocate For the Resp-State : Ms. Shalini Shahdeo, A.C to SC (L&C)-I ---------
06/Dated: 12
th January, 2026
1. The present writ petition has been filed for the following relief :-
“(a) for issuance of an appropriate writ(s),
order(s), direction(s) upon the respondents, for direction upon the respondent concerned to make necessary correction in recent Survey Map of Mouza Haidar Nagar, Thana No. 303, District Palamau by comparing it by the old/earlier Survey Map of Mouza Haidar Nagar, Thana No. 303, for which petitioner No. 1 has already requested the Deputy Commissioner, Palamau vide her Representation dated 06-07-2023 (Postal receipt dated 07-07-2023). - 1 - W.P.(C) No.3043 of 2024
2026:JHHC:643 (b) for direction upon the respondents concerned to remeasured the Purchased lands of the petitioners on the basis of Old Survey Map because as per that Survey map, petitioners have not encroached any Government land/Public land.”
2. After some arguments, learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw the present writ petition, as the provisions under Section 87 of the Chhotanagpur Tenancy Act, 1908, is available for correction by the Parliamentary Legislation.
3.
Learned counsel for the State has raised no objection.
4. In that view of the matter, the present writ petition is, hereby, disposed of giving liberty to the petitioners to approach the appropriate authority under Section 87 of the Chhotanagpur Tenancy Act, 1908 .
5. With the aforesaid liberty, the present writ petition is, hereby, disposed of.
6. Pending interlocutory application, if any, stands
disposed of.
(Rajesh Kumar, J.) 12th January, 2026 Ravi-Chandan/- Uploaded on 13.01.2026 - 2 - W.P.(C) No.3043 of 2024