Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 10697 (ALL)

VYAS @ VED VYAS MISHRA v. AMIT KUMAR, EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, ELECTRICITY STORE DIVISION (PUVVNL)

CAPL/6342/2026 · 2026-09-30

Vikas Budhwar

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 6342 of 2026 Court No. - 53 HON'BLE VIKAS BUDHWAR, J. 1. The present contempt application has been preferred alleging willful defiance of the order dated as well as Judgment and order dated 6.2.2026 passed in Writ-A No.1783 of 2026, order whereof is quoted herein under:- "1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Devesh Vikram, learned counsel for respondent nos. 2 to 5 and learned Standing Counsel for the respondent-State. 2. The writ petition is filed with the following prayers:- "i) issue, a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents to pay the retiral benefits i.e. C.P.F., Gratuity, Leave Encashment and Group Insurance etc. alongwith interest @ 18% P.A. forthwith to the petitioner. ii) issue, a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents to consider and take final decision in the matter of payment of retiral benefits i.e. C.P.F. Gratuity Leave Encashment and Group Insurance of the petitioner within specific period as fixed by this Hon'ble Court." 3. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner has filed a representation dated 12.8.2025 before the respondent no. 5, however, till date the aforesaid representation of the petitioner has not been decided by the concerned authority. 4. Learned counsel for respondent no. 5 submits that the representation of the petitioner would be decided by respondent no. 5 in accordance with law in a time bound manner. 5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and the submissions of learned counsel for the parties, it is hereby directed that respondent no. 5 shall decide the Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Rakesh Kumar Mishra Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : Vyas @ Ved Vyas Mishra .....Applicant(s) Amit Kumar, Executive Engineer, Electricity Store Division (Puvvnl) .....Opposite Party(s) representation dated 12.8.2025 filed by the petitioner within a period of three months from the date of production of certified copy of this order, failing which petitioner will be entitled to interest @ 8 percent per annum upon expiry of three months till actual payment is made. 6. With the aforesaid observation/direction, the writ petition stands disposed of." 2. Today, instructions have been produced dated 28.09.2026 by Sri Devesh Vikram learned counsel annexing therewith the copy of the order dated 12.02.2025, deciding the representation of the applicant. 3. Since the order of the Writ-Court has been substantially complied with, the contempt application is consigned to record, leaving it open for the applicant to question the same before appropriate forum. 4. Let a copy of the instructions be served upon the counsel for the applicant. 5. Instructions filed today are taken on record and marked as Appendix 'A'. October 1, 2026 N.S.Rathour CAPL No. 6342 of 2026 2 (Vikas Budhwar,J.) Digitally signed by :- NIPENDRA SINGH RATHOUR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad