Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 10696 (CHH)

HARIKISHAN YADAV v. UNION OF INDIA, THROUGH C.B.I.

CRA/615/2011 · 2026-02-23

Shri Bibhu Datta Guru

Criminal Appealbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2026:CGHC:9452 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRA No. 615 of 2011 Harikishan Yadav , aged about 74 years, S/o Piluram Yadav, The then Nayak (Daftari), State Bank of India, Baloda Bazar Branch, Tahsil Baloda Bazar, District Raipur (C.G.), R/o Village- Khairghata, Thana & Post- Baloda Bazar, Distt,- Raipur (C.G.) ... Appellant versus Union Of India, Through C.B.I. Jabalpur (M.P.) at present Bhilai Unit, Bhilai District Durg (C.G.) ... Respondent(s) (Cause title taken from CIS) For Appellant : None For Respondent : Shri Vaibhav A. Goverdha, Advocate Hon'ble Shri Bibhu Datta Guru , Judge Order on Board 24.02.2026 1. This criminal appeal is arising out of judgment of conviction and sentence dated 30.07.2011 passed by the learned Special Judge (C.B.I.) and First Additional Sessions Judge, Raipur SHOAIB ANWAR Digitally signed by SHOAIB ANWAR Date: 2026.02.24 14:57:44 +0530 2 District Raipur (C.G.) in Special Criminal Case (C.B.I.) No. 15/2004, whereby the appellant has been convicted and sentenced as under: Conviction Sentence U/s 120-B of I.P.C. Six months Rigorous Imprisonment U/s 420 r/w Sec. 120-B of I.P.C Three years Rigorous imprisonment and fine of Rs. 5000/- in default in payment of fine further 6 months simple imprisonment U/s 468 r/w Sec. 120-B of I.P.C Three years Rigorous imprisonment and fine of Rs. 5000/- in default in payment of fine further 6 months simple imprisonment U/s 471 r/w Sec. 120-B of I.P.C Three years Rigorous imprisonment and fine of Rs. 5000/- in default in payment of fine further 6 months simple imprisonment U/s 13(2) r/w Sec. 13(1) (d) - of Prevention of Corruption Act, Three years Rigorous imprisonment and fine of Rs. 5000/- in default in payment of fine further 6 months simple imprisonment All sentences will run concurrently 3 2. On the last date of hearing, no one appeared on behalf of the appellant for which a bailable warrant had been issued for securing the presence of the appellant. However, as per the report, the Reserve Inspector, Commissionerate, Raipur (C.G.) has submitted an intimation along with the death certificate of the appellant stating that the appellant expired on 08.10.2017. 3. In view of the said report, and as no application has been filed by the legal representatives of the appellant seeking permission to prosecute the appeal, the present appeal stands abated and is accordingly disposed of. 4. As Criminal Appeal No. 610/2011 is pending consideration, the record of the trial court of this appeal be tagged with CRA No. 610/2011. Sd/- (Bibhu Datta Guru) Judge Shoaib