1. with Section 482 Cr.P.C., for quashing of FIR No. under Sections 115(2), 351(1), 351(3), 3(5) 110 BNS has been deleted later on ) IPC added later Police Station Hathur, District Rural Ludhiana, proceedings arising therefrom on the basis of the compromise. 2. which was though on the head, however, the injured h himself medico 3. 23.03.2026, directed the parties to appear before the trial Court/Illaqa Magistrate for recording their statements with regard t 4. been received from the This petition has been filed under Section with Section 482 Cr.P.C., for quashing of FIR No. ections 117(2), 238 BNS (322 and 201 IPC) 115(2), 351(1), 351(3), 3(5) BNS, (109 BNS has been deleted later on ) (Section 308, 323, 506, 34 added later on and 308 IPC has been deleted later Police Station Hathur, District Rural Ludhiana, proceedings arising therefrom on the basis of the compromise. Learned counsel submits that there were 3 injuries, 1 of which was though on the head, however, the injured h himself medico-legally examined qua the same. This Court while issuing notice of motion vide order dated , directed the parties to appear before the trial Court/Illaqa Magistrate for recording their statements with regard t Pursuant to the aforesaid order, report dated been received from the learned Judicial Magistrate Ist Class, This petition has been filed under Section 528 of BNSS read with Section 482 Cr.P.C., for quashing of FIR No.116 dated 26.09.2025, 117(2), 238 BNS (322 and 201 IPC) (added later on) 110, BNS added later on and Section (Section 308, 323, 506, 34 IPC) (307 has been deleted later on), registered at Police Station Hathur, District Rural Ludhiana, and all subsequent proceedings arising therefrom on the basis of the compromise. Learned counsel submits that there were 3 injuries, 1 of which was though on the head, however, the injured had refused to get legally examined qua the same. This Court while issuing notice of motion vide order dated , directed the parties to appear before the trial Court/Illaqa Magistrate for recording their statements with regard to the compromise. Pursuant to the aforesaid order, report dated 27.04.2026 has learned Judicial Magistrate Ist Class, Jagraon. A PARVEEN KUMAR 2026.04.29 16:34 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment. perusal of the said report reveals that statements of the concerned persons have been recorded in the present case, who have stated that the matter has been settled between them and they have no objection in case the FIR in question is quashed. The compromise effected between them is genuine, without any undue influence and coercion. It is stated in the report that there are four accused. None of the accused has been declared as proclaimed offender and is not involved in any other FIR. 5. Heard learned counsel for the parties and also gone through the case file. 6. PARVEEN KUMAR 2026.04.29 16:34 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment. PARVEEN KUMAR 2026.04.29 16:34 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment. FIR No.116 dated 26.09.2025, under Sections 117(2), 238 BNS (322 and 201 IPC) (added later on) 110, 115(2), 351(1), 351(3), 3(5) BNS, (109 BNS added later on and Section 110 BNS has been deleted later on) (Section 308, 323, 506, 34 IPC) (307 IPC added later on and 308 IPC has been deleted later on), registered at Police Station Hathur, District Rural Ludhiana, PARVEEN KUMAR 2026.04.29 16:34 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.