Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 1069 (RAJ)

BHAIRU LAL JAT S/O RODURAM v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CCP/719/2024 · 2026-03-19

Anand Sharma

Contempt Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:11831] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Contempt Petition No. 719/2024 IN S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.3454/2024 Bhairu Lal Jat S/o Roduram, Aged About 37 Years, R/o Village Pathraj Kalan, Post Bhawta Tehsil Todaraisingh, District Tonk, Rajasthan-304505. ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, Government Secretariat, Jaipur (Rajasthan). 2. Shree Somya Jha, District Collector (Land Record) Tonk, Rajasthan. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : None present For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manoj Choudhary with Ms. Pooja Dixit on behalf of Mr. G.S. Gill, AAG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND SHARMA Order 19/03/2026 1. This contempt petition has been filed by the petitioner alleging non-compliance of order dated 24.04.2024 passed by the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.3454/2024 (Bhairu Lal Jat Vs. State of Rajasthan & Anr.), whereby directions were given to the respondents to decide the representation filed by the petitioner. 2. Learned counsel for the respondents, at the outset, submitted that in compliance of directions given by this Court on 24.04.2024, respondents have decided the representation filed by [2026:RJ-JP:11831] (2 of 2) [CCP-719/2024] the petitioner vide order dated 07.03.2025 and copy thereof has also been enclosed along with reply to the contempt petition as Annexure-R/1. 3. In view of above, there is no case of deliberate and wilful disobedience on part of the respondents, hence, this contempt petition is dismissed. 4. Notices stand discharged. (ANAND SHARMA),J DAKSH/53