Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2026:JHHC:500 1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND, RANCHI
----
A.B.A. No. 7537 of 2025
---- 1.Amitabh Verma, aged about 38 years son of Kaila Mahto @ Khublal Mahto 2.Nirmal Verma aged about 36 years son of Kaila Mahto @ Khublal Mahto 3.Bahadur Mahto, aged about 65 years son of late Mangar Mahto 4.Ritlal Mahto, aged about 58 years son of late Mangar Mahto 5.Kaila Mahto @ Khublal Mahto aged about 70 years son of late Manger Mahto 6.Anil Verma, aged about 30 years son of Bahadur Mahto 7.Badri Mahto, aged about 72 years son of late Sona Mahto 8.Suresh Verma, aged about 42 years son of Badri Mahto 9.Sanichar Mahto, aged about 70 years son of late Ghanshyam Mahto, All residents of Village Leda Tola, Karmatand, PO Leda, PS Giridih (M), District Giridih
.... Petitioners -- Versus --
The State of Jharkhand
.... Opposite Party
----
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI
---
For the Petitioner
:- Mr. Shri Niwas Roy, Advocate
For the State
:- Mrs Anuradha Sahay, Advocate
---- 2/09.01.2026 Heard learned counsels for petitioners and for State.
2.
The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with Giridih (M) PS Case No.139 of 2025, for offence registered under section 191(2), 191(3), 190, 126(2), 115(2), 118, 329, 352, 351(2), 109, 303(2) of BNS, , pending in court of learned Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Giridih.
3.
Learned counsel for petitioner submits that petitioners and the informant are the agnets and there are case and counter case between the parties and in the case filed by the petitioners’ side, two of the persons have been succumbed to the injuries. He next
2026:JHHC:500 2
submits that however nobody has received injury from other side in present case for which petitioners are seeking anticipatory bail.
4. Learned State counsel opposes prayer and submits that allegations of assault are there.
5.
Considering that both the sides are agnets and in the case lodged by the petitioners’ side, two of the persons have been succumbed to the injuries, however, that has not happened in the present case. It has been pointed out that due to the land dispute, the incident took place and there are case and counter case between both the parties and the petitioners have got no criminal antecedent as disclosed in paragraph no.25, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to petitioners.
6. Accordingly, petitioners, above named, are hereby directed to surrender before learned court within four weeks from today, and in event of their surrender/arrest, petitioners, above named, shall be released on bail, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) each, with two sureties of like amount each, to satisfaction of learned Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Giridih, in connection with Giridih (M) PS Case No.139 of 2025, subject to the conditions as laid down under section 482(2) of Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023.
( Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) 09.01.2026 SI/