1 ( 2026:HHC:19457 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA COPC No.375 of 2026 Date of Decision: 25.05.2026 ___________________________________________________ Minakshi ....Petitioner Versus Rakesh Kanwar and another …Respondents ___________________________________________________ Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sushil Kukreja, Judge Whether approved for reporting?1 ________________________________________________ For the petitioner : Mr. Rocky, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General. ________________________________________________ Sushil Kukreja, Judge (Oral) Learned Additional Advocate General has placed on record communication dated 06.05.2026, alongwith copy of office order dated 29.04.2026, wherein it has been stated that the necessary orders in compliance to the judgment/ order under reference have been passed by the concerned Deputy Director of School Education, vide order dated 29.04.2026. 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 ( 2026:HHC:19457 ) 2. Therefore, in view of the above, no further orders are required to be passed in the present contempt petition and accordingly the same is closed and disposed of. Notice is discharged. However, liberty is reserved to the petitioner to avail appropriate remedy, in accordance with law, if she is still aggrieved. ( Sushil Kukreja ) May 25, 2026 Judge (V.Himalvi)