Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 10684 (RAJ)

HARI SINGH LAMBORA S/O SH. LAXMI NARAIN v. REGISTERAR- GENERAL

CRLMP/3614/2025 · 2026-07-28

Anil Kumar Upman

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:29207] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 3614/2025 CNR: RJHC020493982025 | URN: CRLMP / 8395U / 2025 Hari Singh Lambora S/o Sh. Laxmi Narain, Aged About 64 Years, R/o 80, Brijraj Enclave, Panchayawala, Jaipur. ----Petitioner Versus 1. Registerar- General, Rajasthan High Court, Jaipur Bench, Jaipur. 2. Sh. Deepak Chauhan Advocate S/o Unknown, R/o G2 Sterling Apartments B6B Prithviraj Road, Opposite Central Park, C-Scheme, Jaipur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Hari Singh Lambora, present in person For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vishnu Kant Sharma for respondent No.1 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 28/07/2026 1. The petitioner is present in person. He submits that the revision petition filed by him against the order of cognizance dated 28.09.2021 is pending before the learned Revisional Court. In these circumstances, he prays that the same be decided expeditiously. It is submitted that on several occasion, he has made submissions before the learned Revisional Court but till date no final order has been passed. 2. Considering the limited prayer made by the petitioner and in the interest of justice, this Court deems it just and proper to direct the learned Revisional Court i.e., Additional District and Sessions [2026:RJ-JP:29207] (2 of 2) [CRLMP-3614/2025] Judge No.3, Jaipur Metro-I to decide Criminal Revision No.217/2024 filed by the petitioner within a period of one month, if there is no legal impediment in continuation of the proceedings, from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. Needless to say that the petitioner would be given an opportunity of hearing before passing the final order. It is expected from the learned Revisional Court that all the submissions advanced by the petitioner as well as the judgments he is relying upon, will be considered. 3. It is made clear that no unnecessary adjournment shall be given in this matter. 4. With the aforesaid directions, this criminal misc. petition as well as pending application(s) stands disposed of. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J GAUTAM JAIN/245